Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992;22(5):337-8.
doi: 10.1007/BF02016249.

Cyclic direct radionuclide voiding cystography: increasing reliability in detecting vesicoureteral reflux in children

Affiliations

Cyclic direct radionuclide voiding cystography: increasing reliability in detecting vesicoureteral reflux in children

J J Fettich et al. Pediatr Radiol. 1992.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish the sensitivity of cyclic direct radionuclide cystography (RVC) in detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in infants and small children, and to compare it to the conventional (one cycle only) RVC. 428 patients (856 renal units) were admitted to the study from January 1991 through March 1992 and all had a cyclic RVC. The age of the patients ranged from 4 months to 7 years. The overall agreement of both cycles in detecting VUR in this study was 45%, the lowest being in detecting VUR I (36%), and the highest in detecting VUR III (86%). If we had used a conventional RVC (the first cycle only), 17 (29%) VUR I, 50 (36%) VUR II and 3 (9%) VUR III, which were detected in the second cycle only, would have been missed. We conclude that cyclic RVC detected 43% more VURs than the conventional (first cycle only) RVC, and would therefore recommend its use as a standard procedure instead of the conventional RVC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Urol Radiol. 1989;11(4):217-20 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1987 Jun;34(3):747-70 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Nephrol. 1990 Sep;4(5):485-90 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Radiol. 1989;19(5):299-301 - PubMed
    1. Urol Radiol. 1983;5(3):161-73, 175 - PubMed