Neural computing in cancer drug development: predicting mechanism of action
- PMID: 1411538
- DOI: 10.1126/science.1411538
Neural computing in cancer drug development: predicting mechanism of action
Abstract
Described here are neural networks capable of predicting a drug's mechanism of action from its pattern of activity against a panel of 60 malignant cell lines in the National Cancer Institute's drug screening program. Given six possible classes of mechanism, the network misses the correct category for only 12 out of 141 agents (8.5 percent), whereas linear discriminant analysis, a standard statistical technique, misses 20 out of 141 (14.2 percent). The success of the neural net indicates several things. (i) The cell line response patterns are rich in information about mechanism. (ii) Appropriately designed neural networks can make effective use of that information. (iii) Trained networks can be used to classify prospectively the more than 10,000 agents per year tested by the screening program. Related networks, in combination with classical statistical tools, will help in a variety of ways to move new anticancer agents through the pipeline from in vitro studies to clinical application.
Similar articles
-
Predictive statistics and artificial intelligence in the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Drug Discovery Program for Cancer and AIDS.Stem Cells. 1994 Jan;12(1):13-22. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530120106. Stem Cells. 1994. PMID: 8142917
-
Discrimination techniques applied to the NCI in vitro anti-tumour drug screen: predicting biochemical mechanism of action.Stat Med. 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15;13(5-7):719-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780130532. Stat Med. 1994. PMID: 8023045
-
Linking pathway gene expressions to the growth inhibition response from the National Cancer Institute's anticancer screen and drug mechanism of action.Pharmacogenomics J. 2005;5(6):381-99. doi: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500331. Pharmacogenomics J. 2005. PMID: 16103895
-
Panel of human cancer cell lines provides valuable database for drug discovery and bioinformatics.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;52 Suppl 1:S74-9. doi: 10.1007/s00280-003-0649-1. Epub 2003 Jun 18. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003. PMID: 12819939 Review.
-
Screening with COMPARE analysis for telomerase inhibitors.Methods Mol Biol. 2002;191:197-207. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-189-2:197. Methods Mol Biol. 2002. PMID: 11951607 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Multitask learning improves prediction of cancer drug sensitivity.Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 23;6:31619. doi: 10.1038/srep31619. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27550087 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of cancer cell-line origins using fluorescence image-based phenomic screening.PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032096. Epub 2012 Feb 23. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22384151 Free PMC article.
-
Cell line-based platforms to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of candidate anticancer agents.Nat Rev Cancer. 2010 Apr;10(4):241-53. doi: 10.1038/nrc2820. Epub 2010 Mar 19. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010. PMID: 20300105 Review.
-
STITCH: interaction networks of chemicals and proteins.Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D684-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm795. Epub 2007 Dec 15. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008. PMID: 18084021 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing cDNA and oligonucleotide array data: concordance of gene expression across platforms for the NCI-60 cancer cells.Genome Biol. 2003;4(12):R82. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-12-r82. Epub 2003 Nov 25. Genome Biol. 2003. PMID: 14659019 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources