Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1992 Sep;216(3):280-8; discussion 288-90.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199209000-00007.

Growth hormone and insulin reverse net whole body and skeletal muscle protein catabolism in cancer patients

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Growth hormone and insulin reverse net whole body and skeletal muscle protein catabolism in cancer patients

R F Wolf et al. Ann Surg. 1992 Sep.

Abstract

The authors examined the effect of recombinant-human growth hormone (r-hGH) and insulin (INS) administration on protein kinetics in cancer patients. Twenty-eight cancer patients either received r-hGH for 3 days (GH group, n = 12, weight loss = 6 +/- 2%) or were not treated (control [CTL] group, n = 16, weight loss = 11 +/- 2%) before metabolic study. Recombinant-human growth hormone dose was 0.1 mg/kg/day (n = 6) or 0.2 mg/kg/day (n = 6). Patients then underwent measurement of baseline protein kinetics (GH/B, CTL/B) followed by a 2-hour euglycemic insulin infusion (1 mU/kg/minute) and repeat kinetic measurements (GH/INS,CTL/INS). Whole-body protein net balance (mumol leucine/kg/minute) was higher (p less than 0.05) in GH/INS (0.20 +/- 0.06) than in CTL/INS (0.06 +/- 0.03) or GH/B (-0.19 +/- 0.03). Skeletal muscle protein net balance (nmol phenylalanine/100 g/minute) in GH/INS (25 +/- 6) and CTL/INS (19 +/- 5) was higher than CTL/B (-18 +/- 3). Recombinant-human growth hormone and insulin reduce whole-body and skeletal muscle protein loss in cancer patients. Simultaneous use of these agents during nutritional therapy may benefit the cancer patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Surg. 1989 Oct;210(4):513-24; discussion 524-5 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1990 Jul 5;323(1):1-6 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 1986 Aug;100(2):188-97 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1988 Jul;208(1):6-16 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1987 Dec;80(6):1784-93 - PubMed

Publication types