Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 Jul;27(4):425-33.

Measurement of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin by isoelectric focusing/western blotting and by micro anion-exchange chromatography/radioimmunoassay: comparison of diagnostic accuracy

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1418115
Comparative Study

Measurement of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin by isoelectric focusing/western blotting and by micro anion-exchange chromatography/radioimmunoassay: comparison of diagnostic accuracy

Y Xin et al. Alcohol Alcohol. 1992 Jul.

Abstract

At present, the most reliable marker of recent and heavy alcohol intake is carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT). While most CDT quantitation methods (including immunofixation and micro anion-exchange chromatography [MAEC] combined with radioimmunoassay [RIA]) either lack the precision required for diagnostic usage or are not commercially available, we recently described an isoelectric focusing/Western blotting (IEF/WB) procedure that provides sensitive and specific assessment of serum CDT content. However, a modified MAEC/RIA kit, supposedly more reliable than the original, is also being advanced as suitable for widespread clinical application. Therefore, we compared this modified MAEC/RIA procedure to the IEF/WB method of CDT quantitation in the following 108 subjects; 53 alcoholics undergoing detoxification without clinical or histological evidence of liver disease, 24 recently drinking alcoholics with biopsy-proven liver disease, eight alcoholics abstinent for more than 30 days with biopsy-proven liver disease, seven non-drinking patients with non-alcoholic liver disease, and 16 healthy controls. Although CDT measurements by the two methods were correlated (r = 0.60, P < 0.01), serum CDT values obtained with IEF/WB were nearly five-fold higher than those obtained with MAEC/RIA (e.g. 140.0 +/- 58 versus 28.5 +/- 16 mg/l among the active drinkers). Of the two methods, IEF/WB exhibited significantly greater sensitivity than MAEC/RIA for detecting recent, heavy drinking (75% versus 61%, P < 0.05) and generated no false positives whereas MAEC/RIA gave falsely elevated CDT levels in 37% of the abstinent alcoholics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources