Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1964 Jul;88(1):55-9.
doi: 10.1128/jb.88.1.55-59.1964.

CULTIVATION OF LEPTOSPIRAE. II. GROWTH AND LYSIS IN SYNTHETIC MEDIUM

CULTIVATION OF LEPTOSPIRAE. II. GROWTH AND LYSIS IN SYNTHETIC MEDIUM

O H STALHEIM et al. J Bacteriol. 1964 Jul.

Abstract

Stalheim, O. H. V. (University of Wisconsin, Madison), and J. B. Wilson. Cultivation of leptospirae. II. Growth and lysis in synthetic medium. J. Bacteriol. 88:55-59. 1964.-Differences were found in the ability of leptospirae to grow in a synthetic medium; 43 strains, consisting of 16 serotypes, were tested and designated as either type I or type II. Type I leptospirae did not grow; type II grew and could be subcultured. The lytic effect of several lipids was measured with Leptospira pomona and L. canicola as representatives of type I and II leptospirae, respectively. L. pomona organisms were rapidly lysed by the monoolein of the synthetic medium and by other lipids as well; L. canicola cells were consistently more resistant. Although both organisms incorporated similar amounts of label when incubated in the presence of oleic-1-C(14) acid, only L. canicola grew in a modified, nonlytic synthetic medium. No differences were found in susceptibility to lysis between virulent and avirulent L. canicola organisms. Mutant type I leptospirae grown in synthetic medium had increased resistance to lysis by surface-active agents; they were poorly agglutinated by antiserum. The role of protein in the growth and antigenicity of type I leptospirae is discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Bacteriol. 1964 Jul;88:48-54 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1960 Sep;80:406-11 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Med. 1955 Sep 1;102(3):291-305 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1960 Dec;80(6):851-60 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1963 May;85:976-82 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources