Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 Aug;3(4):407-14.

Antiphospholipid antibodies and thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison of three lupus anticoagulant assays and anticardiolipin ELISA in 188 patients

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1420816
Comparative Study

Antiphospholipid antibodies and thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison of three lupus anticoagulant assays and anticardiolipin ELISA in 188 patients

T Jouhikainen et al. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1992 Aug.

Abstract

The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in 188 unselected patients with systemic lupus erythematosus was studied using the recalcification time, kaolin clotting time (KCT), dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and anticardiolipin ELISA (aCL) to identify patients with a high or low risk of thrombosis among patients with aPL. aPL were detected by at least one method in 104 (55%) of the patients. Despite heterogeneity, lupus anticoagulant (LA) methods correlated reasonably well with each other (r = 0.736-0.968), but poorly with aCL (r = 0.241-0.549). Positivity in LA assays and immunoglobulin G (IgG)-aCL were associated with patients who experienced thrombosis (P less than 0.001 for all assays). Patients with both LA and aCL had experienced thrombosis more often than those having only one (odds = 6.3, P less than 0.001). When patients with aPL were ranked by relative strength of the finding and divided into tertiles, a history of thrombosis was associated with membership in the strongest tertile of at least one assay (odds = 4.2, P = 0.002). LA and aCL had similar sensitivities for thrombosis (61% and 63%, respectively), but LA was more specific than aCL (79% vs 53%). The best combination of two assays was KCT with dRVVT (61% sensitivity, 87% specificity). Maximal sensitivity (71%) for thrombosis could be achieved by adding IgG-aCL to these two assays, but specificity was lower (73%). In conclusion, a high thrombotic risk among patients with aPL was indicated by the simultaneous presence of both LA and aCL, strongly positive aPL, and, among aCL, IgG-class antibodies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources