Modeling distribution of donor hearts to maximize early candidate survival
- PMID: 1424004
Modeling distribution of donor hearts to maximize early candidate survival
Abstract
Background: Priority for cardiac transplantation should reflect the relative waiting list mortality and operative mortality of outpatient candidates and critical candidates.
Methods and results: To determine how to distribute donor hearts for maximal overall survival, a Markov model of eight states was constructed from current statistics for outpatient sudden death, deterioration to critical status, operative mortality for outpatients, and operative mortality for critical candidates. Because the fraction of hearts offered to critical candidates varied, expected survival at 1 year was calculated. To determine the factors most critical in determining priority policy, current conditions were then varied over a fourfold range. Priority for critical candidates maximized overall candidate survival (with and without transplantation), increasing 1-year survival to 78% compared with 66% if hearts were offered only to outpatients. The benefit of giving priority to critical patients persisted when current group mortality rates were individually halved or doubled because these rates were still small compared with the 100% expected mortality of critical patients without transplantation. If the outpatient sudden death rate and the operative mortality for critical patients were doubled simultaneously, however, there was a slight negative impact on survival if critical candidates received priority. Regardless of changes in subgroup outcomes, the distribution of donor hearts had a relatively modest impact on survival because of the large excess of candidates.
Conclusions: Critical candidates for transplantation should continue to receive priority even if their operative mortality increases above current levels. However, postoperative outcomes must be assessed in relation to changing pretransplantation risks. Distribution of donor hearts will be most beneficial when it is possible to identify the waiting patients at greatest risk for sudden death and deterioration without transplantation.
Similar articles
-
Outpatient inotropic therapy in heart transplant candidates: should its use influence waiting list priority status?J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998 Aug;17(8):809-16. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998. PMID: 9730431
-
Outcome of listing for heart transplantation in infants younger than six months: predictors of death and interval to transplantation. The Pediatric Heart Transplantation Study Group.J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997 Dec;16(12):1255-66. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997. PMID: 9436138
-
The impending crisis awaiting cardiac transplantation. Modeling a solution based on selection.Circulation. 1994 Jan;89(1):450-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.1.450. Circulation. 1994. PMID: 8281680
-
The new lung allocation system and its impact on waitlist characteristics and post-transplant outcomes.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Summer;20(2):139-42. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2008.04.004. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18707648 Review.
-
Cardiac transplantation: candidate identification, evaluation, and management.Crit Care Nurs Q. 2008 Jul-Sep;31(3):216-29; quiz 230-1. doi: 10.1097/01.CNQ.0000325046.24646.6c. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2008. PMID: 18574369 Review.
Cited by
-
[Batista partial left ventricular resection in terminal heart failure].Herz. 1997 Oct;22(5):272-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03044255. Herz. 1997. PMID: 9441158 Review. German.
-
The impact of heart failure severity at time of listing for cardiac transplantation on survival in pediatric cardiomyopathy.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Jul;30(7):755-60. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.01.718. Epub 2011 Mar 17. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011. PMID: 21419658 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical