Motility of rabbit proximal colon. Relevance of cholinergic pathways and role of different muscarinic receptor subtypes
- PMID: 1425075
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01299869
Motility of rabbit proximal colon. Relevance of cholinergic pathways and role of different muscarinic receptor subtypes
Abstract
To better define the physiologic relevance of the cholinergic muscarinic input to the rabbit colon and the role of different muscarinic receptor subtypes, we studied the effects of atropine, telenzepine (MI antagonist) and DF594 (M3 antagonist) on colonic motility in eight conscious rabbits fitted with bipolar electrodes and strain gauges along the proximal colon. In some experiments, the chronotropic and mydriatic effect of the pharmacological agents were also assessed. Two main patterns of spike activity were identified: short spike bursts (SSBs), which were usually stationary, and long spike bursts (LSBs), which were usually propagated. Both myoelectrical patterns were dose-dependently inhibited by atropine (0.06-4 mumol/kg). Atropine, at the doses of 2-4 mumol/kg, abolished both myoelectrical and mechanical activity. Telenzepine (0.008-0.125 mumol/kg) dose-dependently inhibited migrating LSBs without significant effect on SSBs. Higher doses (0.25-0.5 mumol/kg) inhibited both LSBs and SSBs. DF594 (0.06-2 mumol/kg) dose-dependently inhibited both migrating LSBs and SSBs. The three antimuscarinic agents, at doses that inhibited colonic spike activity by approximately 80% (equiactive doses), behaved as follows on heart rate and pupil diameter: atropine induced tachycardia and mydriasis, telenzepine had no effect, and DF594 induced slight mydriasis with no effect on heart rate. We conclude that spontaneous motility in the rabbit proximal colon depends on a muscarinic excitatory input. M3 receptors are involved in the control of both LSBs and SSBs, while M1 receptors play an important role in the regulation of LSBs. The development of selective antimuscarinic drugs, acting on a given motility pattern and with minimal side effects, may offer new perspectives in the treatment of functional bowel motor disorders.
Similar articles
-
Differential effects of antimuscarinic agents on intestinal motility in the conscious dog.J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993 Feb;264(2):789-94. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993. PMID: 8437127
-
Regional differences in motor responsiveness to antimuscarinic drugs in rabbit isolated small and large intestine.Pharmacol Res. 1995 Jan;31(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/1043-6618(95)80046-8. Pharmacol Res. 1995. PMID: 7784305
-
In vivo study of the role of muscarinic receptors in the parasympathetic control of rabbit colonic motility.J Auton Nerv Syst. 1994 Mar;46(3):217-27. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(94)90039-6. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1994. PMID: 8014373
-
[Subtypes of muscarinic receptors--aspects of their physiologic significance for controlling heart rate in the human].Z Kardiol. 1994;83 Suppl 5:9-20. Z Kardiol. 1994. PMID: 7846951 Review. German.
-
[MI cholinergic receptors of gastric secretion: current status].J Pharmacol. 1985;16 Suppl 2:145-69. J Pharmacol. 1985. PMID: 2867250 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Colonic architectural change on colonoscopy in patients taking psychotropic medications.Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1601-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2636-2. Epub 2012 Oct 18. Surg Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23076462