Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 May;11(5):403-7.
doi: 10.1007/BF01961854.

Value of differential quantitative blood cultures in the diagnosis of catheter-related sepsis

Affiliations

Value of differential quantitative blood cultures in the diagnosis of catheter-related sepsis

J A Capdevila et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 May.

Abstract

A prospective study was performed to assess the value of differential quantitative blood cultures in the diagnosis of catheter-related sepsis when this condition is suspected on clinical grounds and to establish a reliable discriminative value for application without removal of the inserted catheter. A total of 107 central venous catheters from 64 patients were used for the study. Blood was obtained simultaneously through the suspected infected device and from a peripheral venipuncture. The catheter was removed and its tip cultured semiquantitatively. Catheter-related sepsis occurred in 17 patients. Using as cut-off value a colony count fourfold higher in blood drawn through the catheter than in simultaneously drawn peripheral blood, a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 100% and positive predictive value of 100% were obtained. A single bacterial count greater than 100 cfu/ml in the quantitative culture of the catheter blood specimen in the presence of a positive qualitative peripheral blood culture of the same organism was also highly suggestive of catheter-related sepsis. Differential quantitative blood culture is a reliable method for the diagnosis of catheter-associated sepsis without catheter removal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Infect Dis. 1980 Jun;141(6):781-6 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1974 Apr 4;290(14):757-61 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Apr;7(2):125-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1988 Oct;85(4):495-8 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Sep;8(9):807-14 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms