A comparison of six different ways of expressing the bronchodilating response in asthma and COPD; reproducibility and dependence of prebronchodilator FEV1

Abstract

Various indices are used to express the bronchodilating response. It is unclear, however, which index is most informative. The aim of this study was to compare six expressions of the bronchodilating response and to examine: 1) the independence of the prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1); and 2) the reproducibility of the bronchodilating response. Bronchodilating responses (increases in FEV1 60 min after salbutamol 400 micrograms and ipratropium bromide 80 micrograms) on six test occasions, during two years, of 183 patients (72 asthma, 111 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)) from a large bronchodilator intervention study were used. The dependence of the prebronchodilator FEV1 was investigated both between patients (cross-sectional analysis) and within patients (longitudinal analysis) by means of linear regression analysis. The reproducibility of the bronchodilating response was calculated by means of the coefficients of variation (CVs) of the six bronchodilating responses during two years. The CVs of the six expression indices were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). No index was independent of the prebronchodilator FEV1. However, some indices were significantly more dependent on the prebronchodilator lung function and, therefore, less reproducible than others. The "% initial" index (change as a percentage of the prebronchodilator value) was the most dependent on the prebronchodilator lung function and had the worst reproducibility (CV ranged from 50-61%). The "% possible" (change as a percentage of the predicted minus prebronchodilator value) and "% achievable" (change as a percentage of the maximal postbronchodilator minus prebronchodilator value) indices were the least dependent on the prebronchodilator value and had the highest reproducibility (CV ranging from 34-53%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)