A clinical evaluation of hand and ultrasonic instruments on subgingival debridement. 1. With unmodified and modified ultrasonic inserts
- PMID: 1428611
A clinical evaluation of hand and ultrasonic instruments on subgingival debridement. 1. With unmodified and modified ultrasonic inserts
Abstract
This clinical investigation evaluated the effect on subgingival surfaces of three instruments: hand instruments and ultrasonic instruments with modified and unmodified inserts. Ten operators (five dentists and five dental hygienists) performed randomly assigned operative procedures. Pocket depth, instrument limit, and instrument efficiency were evaluated for each type of instrument. The results indicated that there are advantages to using modified ultrasonic inserts for scaling and root planing.
Similar articles
-
Clinical evaluation of subgingival debridement with ultrasonic instruments used by trained and untrained operators.Gen Dent. 1996 May-Jun;44(3):234-7. Gen Dent. 1996. PMID: 8957817
-
Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?Dent Clin North Am. 1998 Apr;42(2):229-44. Dent Clin North Am. 1998. PMID: 9597335 Review.
-
[Ultrasonic instrumentation versus hand instrumentation in periodontics. A review of the literature].Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 1992 Jul;99(7):239-44. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 1992. PMID: 11819997 Review. Dutch.
-
Scaling and root planing without overinstrumentation: hand versus power-driven scalers.Curr Opin Periodontol. 1993:78-88. Curr Opin Periodontol. 1993. PMID: 8401851 Review.
-
Comparative clinical responses related to the use of various periodontal instrumentation.J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Mar;31(3):193-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00467.x. J Clin Periodontol. 2004. PMID: 15016023 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Ultra-morphology of root surface subsequent to periodontal instrumentation: A scanning electron microscope study.J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Jan;16(1):96-100. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.94613. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012. PMID: 22628971 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of manual, magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments--an in vitro profilometric and SEM study.J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Feb;20(1):21-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000100005. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012. PMID: 22437673 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro adhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis to dentine root surface after treatment with Er:YAG laser, ultrasonic system, or manual curette.Photomed Laser Surg. 2009 Oct;27(5):735-41. doi: 10.1089/pho.2008.2324. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009. PMID: 19712018 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of tips for delicate micro-ultrasonic root planing comparing to tips for traditional ultrasonic root planing.Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2012 Jul;3(3-4):90-4. Epub 2012 Jan 14. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2012. PMID: 23386928 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo.Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Jun;12(2):143-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0167-3. Epub 2007 Dec 4. Clin Oral Investig. 2008. PMID: 18060565 Clinical Trial.