Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Aug;46(4):382-6.
doi: 10.1136/jech.46.4.382.

Further evidence of benefits of a (non-randomised) breast cancer screening programme: the DOM project

Affiliations

Further evidence of benefits of a (non-randomised) breast cancer screening programme: the DOM project

H J Collette et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Aug.

Abstract

Study objective: The aim was to demonstrate the benefits of breast cancer screening on mortality.

Design: The study was an evaluation of a breast cancer screening programme by means of different approaches: (1) a case-control study, breast cancer deaths being the cases; (2) comparing the numbers of breast cancer deaths in screened and unscreened women; (3) comparing breast cancer mortality before and after start of the programme; (4) comparing breast cancer mortality in different large cities; (5) comparing screening activity with mortality reduction.

Setting: The setting was a breast cancer screening programme in the city of Utrecht, the DOM project, for women aged 50-64 years old at intake, birth cohort 1911-1925. The programme started in 1974, and there were five screening rounds up to 1984. Participation rate in the first round was 72% (14,697 women).

Main results: (1) Screening was protective against dying from breast cancer, odds ratio 0.52, with a stronger effect in older women and no evidence of confounding; (2) risk ratio of dying from breast cancer for women in the response group was the same as the odds ratio, 0.52; (3) breast cancer death rate after the start of the project was nearly 20% lower than before the project started; after correcting for women who could not have benefited from screening the reduction was 33%; (4) a rise in breast cancer mortality in birth cohort 1911-1925 seen in other large cities without a screening programme due to aging of the cohort was not seen in the city of Utrecht; (5) mortality reduction followed the screening activity with a time lag of approximately 5 years.

Conclusions: Early diagnosis of breast cancer by mammography reduces breast cancer mortality in women 50-64 years old at intake; different approaches to the evaluation of the project give different estimates of the screening effect, making clear that the effect depends on the intensity of the programme.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 1985 Apr 13;1(8433):829-32 - PubMed
    1. Int J Cancer. 1986 Oct 15;38(4):501-4 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1988 Oct 15;297(6654):943-8 - PubMed
    1. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1985 Mar 9;129(10):454-9 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1974 Dec;34(6):2018-27 - PubMed

Publication types