The effect of the new trauma DRGs on reimbursement
- PMID: 1433393
- DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199210000-00002
The effect of the new trauma DRGs on reimbursement
Abstract
Reimbursement for trauma care based on prospective payment has not been satisfactory. The Health Care Financing Administration introduced four new Multiple Significant Trauma (MST) DRGs in 1991 with the intention of covering patients who have had at least two body sites injured. To determine the effect if any on reimbursement, a sample of patients who were assigned the new DRGs over a 5-month period were analyzed. The analysis compared the calculated reimbursement for these 49 patients based on their total accumulated charges, DRG weights, and the average Medicare dollar blend along with the additional weight factor specific for the study facility. This analysis was compared with an additional analysis determining the reimbursement performed on the same patient sample but with DRG weights determined from DRGs derived from the 1989 DRG GROUPER/FINDER. During the 5-month study period, 5.5% of the patients discharged from the hospital has sustained at least one injury covered by ICD-9-CM codes. Of these, 49 (3.9%) were classified into one of the four new MST DRGs. The majority of patients were male (75.5%), the mean age was 31.8 years, and the total charges accumulated were $1,809,192.23. The calculated DRG-based reimbursement was $1,183,495.40, or 65.5% of the total charges. In the second part of the study, using the DRGs available in 1989 for the same sample of patients, the DRG-based reimbursement was $691,437.72, or only 38.2% of the accumulated charges.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Multiple significant trauma diagnosis related groups: analysis and national projections based on the first year in an all-payor prospective payment system.J Trauma. 1992 Mar;32(3):328-34; discussion 334-5. J Trauma. 1992. PMID: 1548721
-
The relationship between hospital per diem billing and DRG reimbursement for urban trauma patients.J Med Syst. 1995 Oct;19(5):375-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02260826. J Med Syst. 1995. PMID: 8613711
-
Trauma case mix and hospital payment: the potential for refining DRGs.Health Serv Res. 1991 Apr;26(1):5-26. Health Serv Res. 1991. PMID: 1901840 Free PMC article.
-
Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine.Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):302-18. Pediatrics. 1999. PMID: 9917473 Review.
-
Description of case-mix adjusters by the Severity of Illness Working Group of the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America (SHEA).Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988 Jul;9(7):309-16. doi: 10.1086/645860. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988. PMID: 3136205 Review.
Cited by
-
[Is polytrauma affordable these days? G-DRG system vs per diem charge based on 1,030 patients with multiple injuries].Unfallchirurg. 2012 Oct;115(10):892-6. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1920-7. Unfallchirurg. 2012. PMID: 21327809 German.
-
[What can the hospital deliver? What must the hospital deliver?].Unfallchirurgie. 1995 Aug;21(4):204-18. doi: 10.1007/BF02588701. Unfallchirurgie. 1995. PMID: 7571159 Review. German. No abstract available.
-
[DRG reimbursement for multiple trauma patients -- a comparison with the comprehensive hospital costs using the German trauma registry].Unfallchirurg. 2004 Jan;107(1):68-75. doi: 10.1007/s00113-003-0715-5. Unfallchirurg. 2004. PMID: 14749855 German.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical