A randomized clinical trial of high-dose epinephrine and norepinephrine vs standard-dose epinephrine in prehospital cardiac arrest
- PMID: 1433686
A randomized clinical trial of high-dose epinephrine and norepinephrine vs standard-dose epinephrine in prehospital cardiac arrest
Abstract
Objective: To determine the relative efficacy of high- vs standard-dose catecholamines in initial treatment of prehospital cardiac arrest.
Design: Randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical trial.
Setting: Prehospital emergency medical system of a major US city.
Patients: All adults in nontraumatic cardiac arrest, treated by paramedics, who would receive epinephrine according to American Heart Association advanced cardiac life support guidelines.
Interventions: High-dose epinephrine (HDE, 15 mg), high-dose norepinephrine bitartrate (NE, 11 mg), or standard-dose epinephrine (SDE, 1 mg) was blindly substituted for advanced cardiac life support doses of epinephrine.
Main outcome measures: Restoration of spontaneous circulation in the field, admission to hospital, hospital discharge, and Cerebral Performance Category score.
Results: Of 2694 patients with cardiac arrests during the study period, resuscitation was attempted on 1062 patients. Of this total, 816 patients met study criteria and were enrolled. In the entire cardiac arrest population, 63% of the survivors were among the 11% of patients who were defibrillated by first responders. The three drug treatment groups were similar for all independent variables. Thirteen percent of patients receiving HDE regained a pulse in the field vs 8% of those receiving SDE (P = .01), and 18% of HDE patients were admitted to the hospital vs 10% of SDE patients who were admitted to the hospital (P = .02). Similar trends for NE were not significant. There were 18 survivors; 1.7% of HDE patients and 2.6% of NE patients were discharged from the hospital compared with 1.2% of SDE patients, but this was not significant (P = .37; beta = .38). There was a nonsignificant trend for Cerebral Performance Category scores to be worse for HDE (3.2) and NE patients (3.7) than for SDE patients (2.3) (P = .10; beta = .31). No significant complications were identified. High-dose epinephrine did not produce longer hospital or critical care unit stays.
Conclusions: High-dose epinephrine significantly improves the rate of return of spontaneous circulation and hospital admission in patients who are in prehospital cardiac arrest without increasing complications. However, the increase in hospital discharge rate is not statistically significant, and no significant trend could be determined for neurological outcome. No benefit of NE compared with HDE was identified. Further study is needed to determine the optimal role of epinephrine in prehospital cardiac arrest.
Comment in
-
High-dose epinephrine in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.JAMA. 1993 Mar 17;269(11):1383. JAMA. 1993. PMID: 8441206 No abstract available.
-
High-dose epinephrine in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.JAMA. 1993 Mar 17;269(11):1383; author reply 1383-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03500110051020. JAMA. 1993. PMID: 8441207 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
High-dose epinephrine in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest.Pediatrics. 1995 Jun;95(6):901-13. Pediatrics. 1995. PMID: 7761219
-
The use of high-dose epinephrine for patients with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest refractory to prehospital interventions.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005 Apr;21(4):227-37. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000161468.12218.02. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005. PMID: 15824681 Clinical Trial.
-
High-dose epinephrine is not superior to standard-dose epinephrine in pediatric in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest.Pediatrics. 1997 Mar;99(3):403-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.3.403. Pediatrics. 1997. PMID: 9041296
-
Epinephrine for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):225-229. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004130. Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 31939791
-
Pediatric patients requiring CPR in the prehospital setting.Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Apr;25(4):495-501. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70265-2. Ann Emerg Med. 1995. PMID: 7710155 Review.
Cited by
-
Wide variability in drug use in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a report from the resuscitation outcomes consortium.Resuscitation. 2012 Nov;83(11):1324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Jul 31. Resuscitation. 2012. PMID: 22858552 Free PMC article.
-
Searching for the evidence in pre-hospital care: a review of randomised controlled trials. On behalf of the Ambulance Response Time Sub-Group of the National Ambulance Advisory Committee.J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):18-23. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.1.18. J Accid Emerg Med. 1999. PMID: 9918280 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Narrative Review of Drug Therapy in Adult and Pediatric Cardiac Arrest.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 6;24(6):163. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2406163. eCollection 2023 Jun. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 39077526 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Child with absent vital signs.Indian J Pediatr. 2001 Mar;68(3):273-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02723205. Indian J Pediatr. 2001. PMID: 11338226
-
Esmolol during cardiopulmonary resuscitation reduces neurological injury in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.Sci Rep. 2021 May 20;11(1):10635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90202-w. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34017043 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous