Frequency and implications of resetting and entrainment with right atrial stimulation in atrial flutter

Abstract

Thirty-three patients (24 with typical and 9 with atypical flutter-wave morphology) were studied to evaluate the incidence and implications of resetting and entrainment of atrial flutter with right atrial stimulation. Resetting with single extrastimulus was present in 23 cases (group A) and absent in 10 (group B). Most cases of reset flutter were typical (20 of 23). Fixed fusion indicative of entrainment was observed in all 29 cases with pacing trains. Groups A and B did not differ significantly in flutter cycle length (230 +/- 20 vs 223 +/- 19 ms), atrial functional refractory period (165 +/- 18 vs 167 +/- 22 ms) or longest paced cycle length producing entrainment (213 +/- 19 vs 210 +/- 19 ms). In contrast, the return cycle after the longest paced cycle length producing entrainment was significantly shorter in group A (228 +/- 27 vs 284 +/- 56 ms; p = 0.001). The return cycle in group A was virtually identical to the flutter cycle length, whereas in group B it was greater (p = 0.002 compared with group A). Resetting was more frequent in typical than atypical flutter (20 of 24 vs 3 of 9; p = 0.01). Both typical and atypical flutter can be transiently entrained by right atrial pacing. Lack of resetting and longer return cycle, suggesting a longer conduction time between the reentrant circuit and the stimulation site, were mostly observed in atypical flutter. The data suggest a different location for both types of flutter, and may have implications for ablation techniques. A more cautious approach, with more extensive mapping, appears appropriate for ablation attempts of atypical flutter.