Surgical glove study questioned

Comment

K B Gaberson. AORN J. 1992 Nov.

. 1992 Nov;56(5):834.

doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(07)68745-6.

No abstract available

Comment on

Surgical gloves. Measuring cost and barrier effectiveness.
Fay MF, Dooher DT. Fay MF, et al. AORN J. 1992 Jun;55(6):1500-3, 1507, 1510-9. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(07)66588-0. AORN J. 1992. PMID: 1610149 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.

[Glove perforation in surgery and protective effect of double gloves].
de Castro-Peraza ME, Garzón-Rodríguez E, Rodríguez-Pérez V, Sosa-Alvarez I, Gutierrez-Hernández J, Asiain-Ugarte C. de Castro-Peraza ME, et al. Enferm Clin. 2010 Mar-Apr;20(2):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2009.10.002. Epub 2010 Jan 29. Enferm Clin. 2010. PMID: 20116312 Clinical Trial. Spanish.
Microperforations of surgical gloves in urology: minimally invasive versus open surgeries.
Feng T, Yohannan J, Gupta A, Hyndman ME, Allaf M. Feng T, et al. Can J Urol. 2011 Apr;18(2):5615-8. Can J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21504649
Frequency of glove perforations and subsequent blood contact in association with selected obstetric surgical procedures.
Chapman S, Duff P. Chapman S, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May;168(5):1354-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90764-9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8498411
[Task and task time should dictate the choice of gloves in health care services].
Wrangsjö K, Ransjö U, Boman A, Skoglund G, Lindberg U. Wrangsjö K, et al. Lakartidningen. 2001 Mar 21;98(12):1383-7, 1389-90. Lakartidningen. 2001. PMID: 11320789 Review. Swedish.
Improving glove barrier effectiveness.
Rabussay DP, Korniewicz DM. Rabussay DP, et al. AORN J. 1997 Dec;66(6):1043-6, 1049-54, 1057-60 passim. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62544-1. AORN J. 1997. PMID: 9413601 Review.