Should women with node-negative breast cancer receive adjuvant chemotherapy?--Insights from a decision analysis model
- PMID: 1446048
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01831472
Should women with node-negative breast cancer receive adjuvant chemotherapy?--Insights from a decision analysis model
Abstract
The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer has been controversial and actively debated since the 1988 National Cancer Institute Clinical Alert. We developed a decision analysis model that used the results of available randomized controlled trials to assess the potential clinical and financial effects of using adjuvant chemotherapy for groups of 45-year-old and 60-year-old women. Using the baseline assumptions, we found that chemotherapy increases quality adjusted life expectancy and survival by a substantial amount at a cost comparable to most accepted medical interventions. The model highlights the uncertainties in duration of benefit from therapy, the need for refinements in risk stratification, the importance of patient preferences about toxicity and benefit, and the need for accurate cost-accounting for oncologic therapies. Decision analysis complements other methods for information gathering, analysis, and synthesis used in clinical research. With the increasing focus on the effectiveness of medical interventions, decision analysis will be an important tool for oncologists to understand.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the cost effectiveness of adjuvant therapies in early breast cancer using a decision analysis model.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1993;25(2):97-105. doi: 10.1007/BF00662134. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1993. PMID: 8347850
-
Efficacy and cost effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer. A decision-analysis model.N Engl J Med. 1991 Jan 17;324(3):160-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199101173240305. N Engl J Med. 1991. PMID: 1898533
-
Should the elderly receive chemotherapy for node-negative breast cancer? A cost-effectiveness analysis examining total and active life-expectancy outcomes.J Clin Oncol. 1993 Apr;11(4):777-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.4.777. J Clin Oncol. 1993. PMID: 8478671
-
Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.NIH Consens Statement. 2000 Nov 1-3;17(4):1-35. NIH Consens Statement. 2000. PMID: 11512506 Review.
-
Adjuvant therapy of node-negative breast cancer.Ann Pharmacother. 1995 Mar;29(3):289-98. doi: 10.1177/106002809502900311. Ann Pharmacother. 1995. PMID: 7606076 Review.
Cited by
-
Benefit valuation in economic evaluation of cancer therapies. A systematic review of the published literature.Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Jul;16(1):17-31. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916010-00003. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999. PMID: 10539119
-
Assessing the cost effectiveness of adjuvant therapies in early breast cancer using a decision analysis model.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1993;25(2):97-105. doi: 10.1007/BF00662134. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1993. PMID: 8347850
-
Tamoxifen: a review of pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life considerations for its use as adjuvant therapy in women with breast cancer.Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Jul;4(1):40-66. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304010-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993. PMID: 10146967 Review.
-
Medical Economics and Quality of Life: Analysis of Factors That Influence the Perception of Medical Cost by Post-surgical Breast Cancer Patients.Breast Cancer. 1995 Oct 31;2(2):143-153. doi: 10.1007/BF02966953. Breast Cancer. 1995. PMID: 11091544
-
A new decision model for cost-utility comparisons of chemotherapy in recurrent metastatic breast cancer.Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;9 Suppl 2:8-22. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199600092-00004. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996. PMID: 10163967 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical