Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Dec;102(6):1800-04.
doi: 10.1378/chest.102.6.1800.

The effects of powered air supply to the respiratory protective device on respiration parameters during rest and exercise

Affiliations

The effects of powered air supply to the respiratory protective device on respiration parameters during rest and exercise

M Arad et al. Chest. 1992 Dec.

Abstract

The common chemical warfare protective masks impose an excessive respiratory load on the wearer due to elevated breathing resistance and increased dead space. For patients with severe respiratory disease, the excessive respiratory effort may be intolerable. Besides, the substantial negative pressure created within the mask during inspiration may result in an inward leakage in individuals having difficulties with proper facial fitting of the mask. The purpose of the current investigation was to evaluate the effects of a blower, actively driving air, through the mask's filter, at a flow (mean +/- SD) of 42 +/- 2 L/min, on respiratory parameters during rest and moderate exercise. Ten healthy subjects of either sex participated in two experimental sessions, wearing the mask with and without the blower. Each session included 6 min of sitting at rest and 6 min of walking on a treadmill (3.2 mph, and 10 percent grade). In nine of the subjects, the active air supply produced a positive inspiratory pressure at rest (5 +/- 4 vs -24 +/- 9 mm H2O peak inspiratory pressure with and without the blower, respectively, p < 0.0001). Inspiratory carbon dioxide concentration (FICO2) at rest was diminished (0.4 +/- 0.4 vs 1.3 +/- 0.7 percent with and without the blower, respectively; p < 0.01) while FIO2 increased from 19.5 +/- 0.7 percent to 20.6 +/- 0.4 percent with the device (p < 0.01). These changes were associated with a significant decrease in respiratory rate (15 +/- 2 vs 18 +/- 3 per minute, p < 0.01). During exercise the blower barely decreased the negative inspiratory pressures, had no effect on other respiratory parameters measured, but significantly shortened the inspiratory/cycle-length time ratio (0.46 +/- 0.03 vs 0.53 +/- 0.03, p < 0.005). The effects of active air supply were not different between male and female subjects. We conclude that the blower is expected to be a useful accessory to respiratory protective devices for patients with pulmonary disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources