Cochlear responses to condensation and rarefaction clicks
- PMID: 14484733
- PMCID: PMC1366386
- DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(62)86838-6
Cochlear responses to condensation and rarefaction clicks
Abstract
Auditory nerve responses to condensation and rarefaction clicks (CC and RC) have been recorded over a wide intensity range with gross electrodes. At low intensities the RC responses are nearly identical to CC responses. At high intensities RC and CC response waveforms are similar, but the latency of the N(1) peak in the RC response is 0.2 msec. shorter than that for the corresponding CC response. At intermediate intensities the RC and CC response waveforms are quite different. These results can be interpreted in terms of a model in which there are two excitatory mechanisms for the neural response, which are operative in different intensity ranges. The cochlear microphonic potential and a "slow" potential are suggested as possible excitatory mechanisms.
Similar articles
-
Comparison between auditory brain stem responses evoked by rarefaction and condensation step functions and clicks.Audiology. 1986;25(1):44-53. doi: 10.3109/00206098609078368. Audiology. 1986. PMID: 3954683
-
Role of suppressive interactions in the cochlear microphonic response to wide-band clicks.Hear Res. 1985;19(3):227-34. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90142-x. Hear Res. 1985. PMID: 4066521
-
Cochlear electrical activity in the C57BL/6 laboratory mouse: volume-conducted vertex and round window responses.Acta Otolaryngol. 1979 Jan-Feb;87(1-2):61-8. doi: 10.3109/00016487909126387. Acta Otolaryngol. 1979. PMID: 760378
-
Cochlear microphonic responses to acoustic clicks in guinea pig and their relation with microphonic responses to pure tones.J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Feb;73(2):592-601. doi: 10.1121/1.389006. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983. PMID: 6841799
-
Audibility, speech perception and processing of temporal cues in ribbon synaptic disorders due to OTOF mutations.Hear Res. 2015 Dec;330(Pt B):200-12. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 15. Hear Res. 2015. PMID: 26188103 Review.
Cited by
-
Putative Auditory-Evoked Neurophonic Measurements Using a Novel Signal Processing Technique: A Pilot Case Study.Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 25;11:472. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00472. eCollection 2017. Front Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28970782 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal Envelope Coding of the Human Auditory Nerve Inferred from Electrocochleography: Comparison with Envelope Following Responses.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 Dec;23(6):803-814. doi: 10.1007/s10162-022-00865-z. Epub 2022 Aug 10. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 35948693 Free PMC article.
-
Field-induced forces at dielectric interfaces as a possible mechanism of RF hearing effects.Bull Math Biol. 1981;43(4):401-13. doi: 10.1007/BF02459430. Bull Math Biol. 1981. PMID: 7317673 No abstract available.
-
Evidence that catecholamines are not the afferent transmitter in the cochlea.Exp Brain Res. 1977 Jun 27;28(3-4):315-24. doi: 10.1007/BF00235713. Exp Brain Res. 1977. PMID: 195827
-
Brainstem auditory evoked potentials suggest a role for the ventral cochlear nucleus in tinnitus.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Dec;13(6):819-33. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0344-1. Epub 2012 Aug 7. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012. PMID: 22869301 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources