Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Sep 20;327(7416):659.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7416.659.

Proactive asthma care in childhood: general practice based randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Proactive asthma care in childhood: general practice based randomised controlled trial

Nicholas J Glasgow et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a general practice based, proactive system of asthma care in children.

Design: Randomised controlled trial with cluster sampling by general practice.

Setting: General practices in the northern region of the Australian Capital Territory.

Participants: 174 children with moderate to severe asthma who attended 24 general practitioners.

Intervention: System of structured asthma care (the 3+ visit plan), with participating families reminded to attend the general practitioner.

Main outcome measures: Process measures: rates for asthma consultations with general practitioner, written asthma plans, completion of the 3+ visit plan; clinical measures: rates for emergency department visits for asthma, days absent from school, symptom-free days, symptoms over the past year, activity limitation over the past year, and asthma drug use over the past year; spirometric lung function measures before and after cold air challenge.

Results: Intervention group children had significantly more asthma related consultations (odds ratio for three or more asthma related consultations 3.8 (95% confidence interval 1.9 to 7.6; P = 0.0001), written asthma plans (2.2 (1.2 to 4.1); P = 0.01), and completed 3+ visit plans (24.2 (5.7 to 103.2); P = 0.0001) than control children and a mean reduction in measurements of forced expiratory volume in one second after cold air challenge of 2.6% (1.7 to 3.5); P = 0.0001) less than control children. The number needed to treat (benefit) for one additional written asthma action plan was 5 (3 to 41) children. Intervention group children had lower emergency department attendance rates for asthma (odds ratio 0.4 (0.2 to 1.04); P = 0.06) and less speech limiting wheeze (0.2 (0.1 to 0.4); P = 0.0001) than control children and were more likely to use a spacer (2.8 (1.6 to 4.7); P = 0.0001). No differences occurred in number of days absent from school or symptom-free day scores.

Conclusions: Proactive care with active recall for children with moderate to severe asthma is feasible in general practice and seems to be beneficial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of trial timeline and participant retention rates

Comment in

References

    1. Wagner EH, Austin BT, von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 1996;74: 511-44. - PubMed
    1. Gibson PG, Coughlan J, Wilson AJ, Abramson M, Bauman A, Hensley MJ, et al. Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(1): CD001117. - PubMed
    1. The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Steering Committee. Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczema: ISAAC. Lancet 1998;351: 1225-32. - PubMed
    1. National Asthma Council of Australia. Asthma management handbook 2002. www.nationalasthma.org.au/publications/amh/asthma_facts.htm (accessed 13 Mar 2003).
    1. Fardy HJ. The 3+ plan for asthma management [correction appears in Aust Fam Physician 1999;28: 208]. - PubMed
    2. Aust Fam Physician 1999;28: 95. - PubMed

Publication types