Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Sep;56(9):862-6.
doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00073-8.

Self-collected versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: an assessment of validity and reliability

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Self-collected versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: an assessment of validity and reliability

Deborah B Nelson et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Sep.

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) in pregnancy is related to numerous adverse events; however, the validity of different methods of vaginal swab collection to diagnosis BV among pregnant women is unclear. This study examines the validity of self-collected compared with provider-collected vaginal swabs and describes the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of BV assessment among a sample of pregnant women early in gestation. Gram-stain evaluation of vaginal samples using the Nugent criteria was conducted to determine the overall and morphotype-specific BV scores. We found strong validity for the overall and morphotype-specific scores comparing self-collected swabs to provider-collected swabs. In addition, we found excellent overall and morphotype-specific inter-rater reliability and excellent intra-rater reliability in our sample. These study results support the use of self-collected vaginal swabs for diagnosing BV and document the reliability of BV assessment among pregnant women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources