Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 Sep;9(3):235-47.

The prevalence of developmental defects of enamel in 15-16-year-old children residing in three districts (natural fluoride, adjusted fluoride, low fluoride) in the north east of England

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1450997
Comparative Study

The prevalence of developmental defects of enamel in 15-16-year-old children residing in three districts (natural fluoride, adjusted fluoride, low fluoride) in the north east of England

J H Nunn et al. Community Dent Health. 1992 Sep.

Abstract

Developmental defects of enamel were assessed in 15-year-old children born and continuously resident in three communities in the north east of England. In naturally fluoridated Hartlepool (F = 1.0-1.3 ppm), artificially fluoridated Newcastle (F = 1.0 ppm) and non-fluoridated Middlesbrough (F < 0.2 ppm) 361, 356 and 376 children respectively were examined. Conventional clinical recording and a photographic technique where colour slides are assessed at random were used and compared. Scoring in both assessments was done by using a modified version of both the Murray and Shaw index and the developmental defects of enamel index. In the clinical assessment more white lines and diffuse opacities were found in the fluoridated areas than in the non-fluoridated area. More opacities were recorded using the photographic assessment than with the clinical assessment, but a similar trend of an increased prevalence of white lines and diffuse opacities was observed using the photographic method. Overall, there was only a small increase in the prevalence of milder forms of enamel defects in fluoridated compared with non-fluoridated areas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types