Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Sep 25:3:23.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-3-23.

Evaluation of adjunctive HPV testing by Hybrid Capture II in women with minor cytological abnormalities for the diagnosis of CIN2/3 and cost comparison with colposcopy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of adjunctive HPV testing by Hybrid Capture II in women with minor cytological abnormalities for the diagnosis of CIN2/3 and cost comparison with colposcopy

Andrea Guyot et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: As a proportion of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2/3) are associated with equivocal cervical smears, which show borderline or mild dyskaryosis, follow up with repeat smears, colposcopy and biopsy is required. Since infection with oncogenic Human Papilloma Virus (HR HPV) has been found to be associated with the development of cervical cancer, HRHPV testing appears to be an alternative.

Objective: The present study assesses if HRHPV testing can predict CIN2/3 in women referred for mild dyskaryosis and borderline cytological changes in an health authority with a referral policy to colposcopy after one single mild dyskaryotic Pap smear.

Study design: The HPV DNA Hybrid Capture II (Digene/Abbott, Maidenhead) was evaluated on 110 consenting women with mild dyskaryosis and 23 women with persistent borderline changes, who were referred for colposcopy between May and November 2001. A cost comparison between two referral policies was performed.

Results: CIN2/3 was diagnosed histologically in 30 of 133 women (22%) with minor cytological abnormalities. As the Receiver Operator Characteristics plot suggested a cut-off of 3 pg/ml the HRHPV HCII was evaluated at 3 RLU (relative light units) and at the manufacturer's recommendation of 1 RLU. At both cut-offs sensitivity and negative predictive value were high at 97%. Specificity was low at 37% at a cut-off of 1 pg/ml and 46% at a cut-off of 3 RLU. To remain cost neutral in comparison to immediate colposcopy the costs for one HR HPV HC II must not exceed pound 34.37 per test at a cut off of 3 pg/ml.

Conclusion: The negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was of good diagnostic value with 0.089 at 1 RLU and 0.072 at 3 RLU, which reduces the post-test probability for CIN2/3 to 2% in this population. Women with minor cytological disorders can be excluded from colposcopy on a negative HR HPV result.Specificity can be improved by restricting HR HPV testing to women with persistent borderline cytological changes or to women over 30 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver Operator Characteristic curve of high risk HPV HC II for the diagnosis of CIN2/3 in women with minor cytological abnormalities (red triangles show performance of Pap smears according to KC61 part C, RLU = ratio of relative light units of specimen to positive controls)

References

    1. Walboomers MM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer A, Shah KV, Snijders PJF, Peto J, Meier CJ, Munoz N. Human Papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189:12–19. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-F. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Southern SA, Herrington CS. Molecular events in uterine cervical cancer. Sex Transm Infect. 1998;74:101–109. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Governmental Statistical Service Cervical Screening Programme, England: 2000–2001. Statistical Bulletin. 2001.
    1. NHSCSP Guidelines for clinical practice and programme management. NHSCSP publication. 1997;8:12–15.
    1. Healthcare Financial Management Association . Introductory Guide. 5. 2000. NHS Finance in the UK; pp. 56–64.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances