Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jul-Aug;5(4):339-46.
doi: 10.1016/S1476-5586(03)80027-1.

Induction of chromosomal instability by chronic oxidative stress

Affiliations

Induction of chromosomal instability by chronic oxidative stress

Charles L Limoli et al. Neoplasia. 2003 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Earlier studies using GM10115 cells analyzed the capability of different DNA-damaging agents to induce genomic instability and found that acute oxidative stress was relatively inefficient at eliciting a persistent destabilization of chromosomes. To determine whether this situation would change under chronic exposure conditions, the human-hamster hybrid line GM10115 was cultured under conditions of oxidative stress. Chronic treatments consisted of 1-hour incubations using a range of hydrogen peroxide (25-200 microM) or glucose oxidase (GO; 5-50 mU/ml) concentrations that were administered once daily over 10 to 30 consecutive days. The toxicity of chronic treatments was modest (- one log kill) and consistent with the low yield of first division aberrations (<5%). However, analysis of over 180 clones and 36,000 metaphases indicated that chronic oxidative stress led to a high incidence of chromosomal instability. Treatment of cells with 100 and 200 microM hydrogen peroxide or 50 mU/ml GO was found to elicit chromosomal instability in 11%, 22%, and 19% of the clones analyzed, respectively. In contrast, control clones isolated after mock treatment did not show signs of chromosomal destabilization. These data suggest that chronic oxidative stress constitutes a biochemical mechanism capable of disrupting the genomic integrity of cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standard curve for the measurement of H2O2. The 1.0, 10, and 100 mM H2O2 stock solutions were prepared and the actual concentration of these solutions was calculated based on its absorbance at 230 nm (ɛ=81/cm/mol). Aliquots of H2O2 (200 µl) were added to 800 µl of PBS containing o-DD (80 µg/ml) and 5 U of HRP (squares) or no HRP (circles). Samples were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour before measuring absorbance at 470 nm. Plots shown are the linear regression fits through all data derived from three independent experiments (±SD).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Generation of H2O2 by GO. GO treatment for 1 hour was made in serum-free DMEM in the presence (∼ 1x 106, squares) or absence (circles) of cells. The background generation of H2O2 in cells was also determined (triangles). Following a range of GO treatments, samples were removed and assayed forH2O2 using the o-DD/HRP assay. Data shown were averaged from duplicate samples taken from each of two independent experiments (±SD).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kinetics of H2O2 production and metabolism. GO (25 mU/ml) was added to serum-free DMEM in the presence (∼1x106, squares) or absence (circles) of cells. H2O2 (200 µM) was also added to cultures of 1x106 cells in serum-free DMEM as a comparison (triangles). Following the addition of GO or H2O2, aliquots were removed over the course of an hour and assayed for H2O2 content using o-DD and HRP. Plots shown were averaged from duplicate samples taken from a typical experiment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Chronic levels of H2O2 exposure. GM10115 cells subjected to chronic oxidative stress were assayed periodically for the determination of H2O2 levels in culture. Triplicate samples removed on days 5, 15, and 30 were analyzed for H2O2 content by the o-DD/HRP assay, and values were converted to H2O2 concentration using the standard curve shown in Figure 1. For each day, increased shading of individual bars (from left to right) corresponds to 5, 10, 25, and 50 mU/ml GO or 25, 50, 100, and 200 (day 5 only) µM H2O2. Bar charts indicate the average of triplicate measurements (±SD).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cell survival after chronic oxidative stress. GM10115 cells subjected to 30 consecutive days of GO or H2O2 exposure were plated for the determination of clonogenic survival. Surviving fraction was normalized to sham-treated controls set to unity. Data represent the average of three independent measurements (±SD).

References

    1. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990;61:759–767. - PubMed
    1. Fearon ER. Human cancer syndromes: clues to the origin and nature of cancer. Nature. 1997;278:1043–1049. - PubMed
    1. Morgan WF, Day JP, Kaplan MI, McGhee EM, Limoli CL. Genomic instability induced by ionizing radiation. Radiat Res. 1996;146:247–258. - PubMed
    1. Nowell PC. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science. 1976;194:23–28. - PubMed
    1. Loeb LA. Mutator phenotype may be required for multistage carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1991;51:3075–3079. - PubMed

Publication types