Experimental verification of convolution/superposition photon dose calculations for radiotherapy treatment planning
- PMID: 14516106
- DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/17/309
Experimental verification of convolution/superposition photon dose calculations for radiotherapy treatment planning
Abstract
This work describes an experimental verification of the two-photon dose calculation engines available on the Helax-TMS (version 6.1) commercial radiotherapy treatment planning system. The performance of the pencil beam convolution and the collapsed cone superposition algorithms was examined for 4, 6, 15 MV beams, under a range of clinically relevant irradiation geometries. Comparisons against measurements were carried out in terms of absolute dose, thus assessment of the accuracy of monitor unit (MU) calculations was also carried out. Results show that both algorithms agree with measurement to acceptable tolerance levels in most cases in homogeneous water-equivalent media irradiated under full scatter conditions. The collapsed cone algorithm slightly overestimates the penumbra width and this is mainly due to discretization effects of the fluence matrix. The accuracy of this algorithm strongly depends on the resolution of the patient density matrix. It is recommended that the density matrix voxel size used for dose calculations is less than 5 x 5 x 5 mm3. The dose in media irradiated under missing tissue geometry, or in the presence of low or high-density heterogeneities, is modelled best with the collapsed cone algorithm. This is of particular clinical interest in treatment planning of the breast and of the thorax. For these treatment sites, a retrospective study of treatment plans indicated in certain cases significant overestimation of the dose to the planning target volume when using the pencil beam convolution model.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.Med Phys. 2006 Sep;33(9):3149-58. doi: 10.1118/1.2241992. Med Phys. 2006. PMID: 17022207 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.Med Phys. 2004 Oct;31(10):2899-911. doi: 10.1118/1.1788932. Med Phys. 2004. PMID: 15543799
-
On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.Phys Med Biol. 2007 Mar 7;52(5):1363-85. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/5/011. Epub 2007 Feb 8. Phys Med Biol. 2007. PMID: 17301460
-
A review of treatment planning for precision image-guided photon beam pre-clinical animal radiation studies.Z Med Phys. 2014 Dec;24(4):323-34. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Mar 12. Z Med Phys. 2014. PMID: 24629309 Review.
-
Advantages of multiple algorithm support in treatment planning system for external beam dose calculations.J Cancer Res Ther. 2005 Jan-Mar;1(1):12-20. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.16085. J Cancer Res Ther. 2005. PMID: 17998620 Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility of a multigroup Boltzmann-Fokker-Planck solution for electron beam dose calculations.Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 24;13(1):1310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27376-y. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36693824 Free PMC article.
-
An institutional experience of quality assurance of a treatment planning system on photon beam.Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2013 Dec 8;19(3):195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2013.10.008. eCollection 2014 May. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2013. PMID: 24936337 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system.Phys Med Biol. 2010 Dec 7;55(23):6999-7008. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/23/S03. Epub 2010 Nov 12. Phys Med Biol. 2010. PMID: 21076191 Free PMC article.
-
A feasibility dosimetric study on prostate cancer : are we ready for a multicenter clinical trial on SBRT?Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 Jul;191(7):573-81. doi: 10.1007/s00066-015-0822-6. Epub 2015 Mar 8. Strahlenther Onkol. 2015. PMID: 25747263 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical implications in the use of the PBC algorithm versus the AAA by comparison of different NTCP models/parameters.Radiat Oncol. 2013 Jul 4;8(1):164. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-164. Radiat Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23826854 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials