The course of moderate amblyopia treated with atropine in children: experience of the amblyopia treatment study
- PMID: 14516802
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00458-6
The course of moderate amblyopia treated with atropine in children: experience of the amblyopia treatment study
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the course of the response to atropine treatment of moderate amblyopia and to assess factors predictive of the treatment response in children 3 years old to younger than 7 years old.
Design: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing atropine and patching (one of the amblyopia treatment studies).
Methods: A total of 195 children 3 years old to younger than 7 years of age with amblyopia in the range of 20/40 to 20/100 from the atropine treatment arm of this trial were enrolled and included in this analysis. At baseline, daily topical atropine was prescribed for the sound eye. During follow-up, a plano spectacle lens was prescribed for the sound eye for patients whose amblyopia had not been successfully treated with atropine alone. Follow-up examinations were performed at 5 weeks, 16 weeks, and 6 months. The primary outcome measure was visual acuity in the amblyopic eye at 6 months.
Results: Mean visual acuity improved from baseline by 1.3 lines after 5 weeks of treatment, by 2.4 lines after 16 weeks, and by 2.8 lines at 6 months. Visual acuity of 20/30 or better and/or 3 or more lines of improvement from baseline was achieved by 75% of the patients. Improvement occurred over the entire range of baseline acuities (20/40 to 20/100) and was not related to patient age (P =.36). Among the 134 patients improving 3 or more lines from baseline, 7% achieved their maximum improvement by 5 weeks and 46% by 16 weeks. Among the 55 patients who did not respond adequately to atropine alone and were prescribed a plano lens for the sound eye, the mean improvement before the use of the plano lens was 1.0 lines, compared with 1.6 lines after prescribing the plano lens (P =.11). None of the demographic or clinical factors assessed was predictive of the response to treatment. A shift in fixation preference at/near from the atropinized sound eye to the amblyopic eye was not required for the amblyopic eye to improve; amblyopic eye acuity improved 3 or more lines in 29 (60%) of the 48 patients who were found to be using the atropinized sound eye on fixation preference testing. A 2 or more line decrease in sound eye visual acuity occurred more frequently when a plano lens was prescribed in addition to atropine (7 of 43, 16%) compared with treatment with atropine alone (4 of 123, 3%; P =.01).
Conclusions: A beneficial effect of atropine is present throughout the age range of 3 years old to younger than 7 years old, and with an acuity range of 20/40 to 20/100. A shift in near fixation to the amblyopic eye is not essential for atropine to be effective in all cases. Sound eye acuity should be monitored when a plano spectacle lens is prescribed for the sound eye to augment the treatment effect of atropine.
Similar articles
-
The course of moderate amblyopia treated with patching in children: experience of the amblyopia treatment study.Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Oct;136(4):620-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00392-1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003. PMID: 14516801 Clinical Trial.
-
Atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at 15 years of age of a randomized clinical trial.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;132(7):799-805. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.392. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24789375 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Pharmacological plus optical penalization treatment for amblyopia: results of a randomized trial.Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;127(1):22-30. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.520. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009. PMID: 19139333 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The treatment of amblyopia: current practice and emerging trends.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;257(6):1061-1078. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04254-w. Epub 2019 Jan 31. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30706134 Review.
-
Compliance and patching and atropine amblyopia treatments.Vision Res. 2015 Sep;114:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Mar 2. Vision Res. 2015. PMID: 25743080 Review.
Cited by
-
The effects of monocular training on binocular functions in anisometropic amblyopia.Vision Res. 2018 Nov;152:74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Jun 27. Vision Res. 2018. PMID: 28636883 Free PMC article.
-
Amblyopia therapy in Asian children: factors affecting visual outcome and parents' perception of children's attitudes towards amblyopia treatment.Singapore Med J. 2019 Jun;60(6):291-297. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2018151. Epub 2018 Nov 29. Singapore Med J. 2019. PMID: 30488078 Free PMC article.
-
Binocular vision therapy for the treatment of Amblyopia-A review.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 May;71(5):1797-1803. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3098_22. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 37203032 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment of severe amblyopia with weekend atropine: results from 2 randomized clinical trials.J AAPOS. 2009 Jun;13(3):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.03.002. J AAPOS. 2009. PMID: 19541265 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized study of network-based perception learning in the treatment of amblyopia children.Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 May 18;15(5):800-806. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.05.17. eCollection 2022. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35601173 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical