Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Sep 3:1:38.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-38.

A review of mothers' prenatal and postnatal quality of life

Affiliations
Review

A review of mothers' prenatal and postnatal quality of life

Andrew Symon. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: Contemporary broad descriptions of health and well-being are reflected in an increasing appreciation of quality of life issues; in turn this has led to a growing number of tools to measure this.

Methods: This paper reviews articles cited in MEDLINE, CINAHL and BIDS which have addressed the concept of quality of life in pregnancy and the period following childbirth.

Results: It describes five groups of articles: those explicitly assessing quality of life in this area; those using broader health assessments as an indicator of quality of life; those articles equating quality of life with certain pregnancy outcomes in identified groups of patients; those studies which identify the possibility of pregnancy as an outcome measure and infer from this that quality of life has been improved; and those articles which are themselves reviews or commentaries of pregnancy and childbirth and which identify quality of life as a feature.

Conclusions: The term 'quality of life' is used inconsistently in the literature. There are few quality of life tools specifically designed for the maternity care setting. Improved or adversely affected quality of life is frequently inferred from certain clinical conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organisation Geneva. 1948.
    1. Coppens M, James D. Organisation of prenatal care and identification of risk. In: Steer P, Weiner C, Gonik B, editor. In High Risk Pregnancy. 2. WB Saunders: London; 1999. pp. 11–22.
    1. Das S. Antenatal care. In: Bennett VR, Brown LK, editor. In Myles Textbook for Midwives. 13. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh; 1999. pp. 209–234.
    1. Clement S, Sikorski J, Wilson J, Das S, Smeeton N. Women's satisfaction with traditional and reduced antenatal visit schedules. Midwifery. 1996;12:120–8. - PubMed
    1. van Teijlingen ER, Hundley V, Rennie A-M, Graham G, Fitzmaurice A. Maternity Satisfaction Studies and Their Limitations: "What Is, Must Still Be Best". Birth. 2003;30:75–82. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00224.x. - DOI - PubMed