WHI: Now that the dust has settled: a commentary

Affiliations

Review

William T Creasman et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep.

. 2003 Sep;189(3):621-6.

doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00978-5.

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, USA.

No abstract available

Comment in

WHI trial: it's time to be critical!
Speroff L. Speroff L. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;189(3):620. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00979-7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 14526277 No abstract available.
WHI, Semmelweis, and the fallacy of "evidence-based medicine".
Kincaid GC. Kincaid GC. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;191(5):1840-1; author reply 1841. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.114. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15547583 No abstract available.
Concerns about published data from the estrogen-progestin (HT) arm of the WHI.
Gass M, Anderson GL, Barad D. Gass M, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;192(1):333; author reply 334. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.088. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15672044 No abstract available.