Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Oct;238(4):486-94; discussion 494-5.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000089858.40725.68.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients

Affiliations

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients

James D Luketich et al. Ann Surg. 2003 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To assess our outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).

Summary background data: Esophagectomy has traditionally been performed by open methods. Results from most series include mortality rates in excess of 5% and hospital stays frequently greater than 10 days. MIE has the potential to improve these results, but only a few small series have been reported. This report summarizes our experience of 222 cases.

Methods: From 1996 to 2002, MIE was performed in 222 patients. Indications for operation included high-grade dysplasia (n = 47) and cancer (n = 175). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used in 78 (35.1%) and radiation in 36 (16.2%). Initially, a laparoscopic transhiatal approach was used (n = 8), but subsequently our approach evolved to include thoracoscopic mobilization (n = 214).

Results: There were 186 men and 36 women. Median age was 66.5 years (range, 39-89). Nonemergent conversion to open procedure was required in 16 patients (7.2%). MIE was successfully completed in 206 (92.8%) patients. The median intensive care unit stay was 1 day (range, 1-30); hospital stay was 7 days (range, 3-75). Operative mortality was 1.4% (n = 3). Anastomotic leak rate was 11.7% (n = 26). At a mean follow-up of 19 months (range, 1-68), quality of life scores were similar to preoperative values and population norms. Stage specific survival was similar to open series.

Conclusions: MIE offers results as good as or better than open operation in our center with extensive minimally invasive and open experience. In this single institution experience, we observed a lower mortality rate (1.4%) and shorter hospital stay (7 days) than most open series. Given these results, we are now developing an intergroup trial (ECOG 2202) to assess MIE in a multicenter setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical port sites.
None
FIGURE 2. Penrose drain around thoracic esophagus.
None
FIGURE 3. Abdominal port sites for laparoscopy.
None
FIGURE 4. Laparoscopic pyloroplasty.
None
FIGURE 5. Laparoscopic gastric tubularization.
None
FIGURE 6. Completed reconstruction using gastric tube.
None
FIGURE 7. Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve after MIE based on cancer stage

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kelsen DP, Ginsberg R, Pajak TF, et al. Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1979-1984. - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128-1137. - PubMed
    1. Overholt BF, Panjehpour M, Ayres M. Photodynamic therapy for Barrett's esophagus: cardiac effects. Lasers Surg Med. 1997;21:317-320. - PubMed
    1. Fernando HC, Luketich JD, Beunaventura PO, et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus EJCTS. 2002;22:1-6. - PubMed
    1. Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Percut Tech. 1991;1:138-143. - PubMed