Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Jul;12(4):300-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0414-3. Epub 2003 Oct 3.

The cartilaginous and osseous geometry of the femoral trochlear groove

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The cartilaginous and osseous geometry of the femoral trochlear groove

Yi-Fen Shih et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004 Jul.

Abstract

Photography was used to study the geometry of the cartilaginous and osseous contours of the distal femur and the orientation of the trochlear groove in 9 fresh-frozen and 24 embalmed knees. The sulcus angle (146.1 degrees +/-5.5 degrees ) decreased from 0 degrees to 50 degrees of femoral flexion then increased afterwards. The maximum slope of the lateral femoral condyle (20.2 degrees +/-5.2 degrees ) also decreased with flexion. Both the sulcus angle ( p=0.0007) and maximum slope ( p=0.0001) were larger at 0 degrees than they were for 60 degrees cartilaginous surfaces. The lateral femoral condylar height decreased, whilst the medial femoral condylar height increased as the flexion increased. The femoral groove was midway between the two femoral epicondyles (49.5+/-3.9%), but deviated laterally as the flexion angle increased. The groove axis deviated distally and laterally from the femoral anatomical axis for both cartilaginous and bony surfaces, and the angle between the groove and anatomical axes was similar for both cartilaginous (19.1 degrees ) and osseous (16.8 degrees ) surfaces. Articular cartilage is not well represented on radiography yet it had a significant effect on the distal femoral geometry, and should be taken into account when evaluating the patellofemoral joint.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 May;(185):178-86 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 1996 Feb;11(2):166-73 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 May;81(3):452-8 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997 Jul-Aug;17 (4):512-5 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 1996 Feb;11(2):163-5 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources