Gear, inertial work and road slopes as determinants of biomechanics in cycling
- PMID: 14530979
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-0948-6
Gear, inertial work and road slopes as determinants of biomechanics in cycling
Abstract
In cycling the gear determines the distance travelled and the mean applied force at each leg thrust. According to Padilla et al. (J Appl Physiol 89:1522-1527, 2000), an elite cyclist was able to cycle for an hour at 14.6 m.s(-1 developing 510 W at a pedal frequency of 101 rpm. Thus, the opposing force was 34 N (=500/14.6), whereas the mean force, developed by the leg muscles, was 144.1 N. It can be calculated that in the same subject cycling on a 20% slope at the same pedal frequency, the velocity would be reduced by about 5 times, i.e. to 2.9 m.s(-1) because of a fivefold increase of the opposing force. In reality, the increase of mean force developed by leg muscles is even larger, because of the fall of the cadence to 60 rpm. In general, during mountain ascents cyclists develop high forces at low cadences that are likely to be more economical; in contrast, on flat ground, they increase the pedalling rates because their aerodynamic posture does not allow high force production. The intermittent pattern of muscular force application generates speed changes that become more evident at great inclines and low cadences. It can be shown that inertial work is appreciable in cycling, increasing with the incline of the road and decreasing with the cadence. However, inertial work does not seem to affect efficiency. Differences in physiologic potential make differences in performance more evident in time trials where the mean incline of the road is not negligible. Cyclists with low body size have an advantageous force versus mass ratio in high mountain ascents.
Similar articles
-
On voluntary rhythmic leg movement behaviour and control during pedalling.Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2015 Jun;214 Suppl 702:1-18. doi: 10.1111/apha.12529. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2015. PMID: 26094819 Review.
-
Power, muscular work, and external forces in cycling.Ergonomics. 1994 Jan;37(1):31-42. doi: 10.1080/00140139408963620. Ergonomics. 1994. PMID: 8112280 Review.
-
Effects on the crank torque profile when changing pedalling cadence in level ground and uphill road cycling.J Biomech. 2005 May;38(5):1003-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.037. J Biomech. 2005. PMID: 15797582 Clinical Trial.
-
A theoretical basis for interpreting the force applied to the pedal in cycling.J Biomech. 1993 Feb;26(2):155-65. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90046-h. J Biomech. 1993. PMID: 8429058
-
The most economical cadence increases with increasing workload.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Aug;92(4-5):443-51. doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1175-5. Epub 2004 Jul 1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004. PMID: 15232702 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
The role of incline, performance level, and gender on the gross mechanical efficiency of roller ski skating.Front Physiol. 2013 Oct 22;4:293. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00293. eCollection 2013. Front Physiol. 2013. PMID: 24155722 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of cycling position on oxygen uptake and preferred cadence in trained cyclists during hill climbing at various power outputs.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Mar;99(4):387-91. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0358-7. Epub 2006 Dec 13. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007. PMID: 17165053
-
Steep uphill cycling using repeated transitions between seated and standing positions results in a lower blood-lactate concentration than continuous use of either seated or standing position.Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Sep 20;6:1395415. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1395415. eCollection 2024. Front Sports Act Living. 2024. PMID: 39371111 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources