Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1992 Dec;10(12):1933-42.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.12.1933.

Preoperative systemic chemotherapy followed by adjuvant postoperative intraperitoneal therapy for gastric cancer: a University of Southern California pilot program

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Preoperative systemic chemotherapy followed by adjuvant postoperative intraperitoneal therapy for gastric cancer: a University of Southern California pilot program

L Leichman et al. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: A clinical trial for patients with gastric cancer amenable to curative resection was undertaken to determine feasibility and response to preoperative systemic chemotherapy followed by postoperative intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy.

Methods and materials: Thirty-eight patients with resectable gastric tumor received two cycles of protracted intravenous (IV)-infusion fluorouracil (5FU), 200 mg/m2/d, for 3 weeks with weekly IV leucovorin 20 mg/m2 and IV cisplatin 100 mg/m2 days 1 and 29. Resection of the gastric tumor followed within 3 weeks of completion of systemic chemotherapy. Those who had all visible tumor removed with clear margins received two cycles of IP floxuridine 3,000 mg (total dose) per day for 3 days and IP cisplatin 200 mg/m2 with IV sodium thiosulfate on the fourth day of IP therapy.

Results: Thirty-seven of 38 patients (97%) received two cycles of systemic chemotherapy. Thirty-five of 38 patients (92%) underwent laparotomy for gastric tumor resection. Thirty-three patients (87%) had gastric resections performed; 29 (76%) had all visible tumor removed with microscopically negative margins. No operative mortality was encountered. Twenty-six patients (68%) received IP treatment. IV neoadjuvant treatment was well tolerated and resulted in 68% of the patients reporting improvement in abdominal pain, 45% objective remissions by computed tomography (CT), 38% objective remissions by gastroscopy and biopsy, and 8% had complete surgical pathologic response. Neutropenic sepsis during the IP treatment phase contributed to the only treatment-related death. Four of 29 completely resected patients (14%) have had tumor recurrence. The median follow-up time of patients remaining alive is now 19 months. The median survival for 38 patients entered onto this protocol has not been reached at 17+ months.

Conclusion: This novel approach to the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the stomach is feasible. The neoadjuvant systemic therapy results in significant primary tumor regression. The determination of whether systemic or IP components of the program contribute to decreased recurrence or increased survival awaits a prospectively randomized clinical trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources