Stratified, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron administered as a multiple-dose regimen versus two single-dose regimens in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting
- PMID: 1453211
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.12.1969
Stratified, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron administered as a multiple-dose regimen versus two single-dose regimens in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting
Abstract
Purpose: This study compares the efficacy and safety of two single-dose regimens with the approved three-dose regimen of ondansetron in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis.
Patients and methods: This multicenter study was a stratified, randomized, double-blind, and parallel group design. Chemotherapy-naive inpatients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg times three doses, every 4 hours or a single 8-mg or 32-mg dose followed by two saline doses that began 30 minutes before cisplatin administration. Cisplatin (high-dose > or = 100 mg/m2 or medium-dose 50 to 70 mg/m2) was given as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes, adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration.
Results: A total of 699 patients (359 high-dose, 340 medium-dose) were enrolled. Of these, 618 were assessable for efficacy (15 ineligible, 66 protocol deviations). The 32-mg dose was superior to the 8-mg single dose with regard to total number of emetic episodes (high-dose, P = .015; medium-dose, P < .001), complete response (no emetic episodes: high-dose, 48% v 35%; P = .048; medium-dose, 73% v 50%; P = .001) and failure rate (> 5 emetic episodes, withdrawn or rescued: high-dose, 20% v 34%; P = .018; medium-dose, 9% v 23%; P = .005). The 32-mg single dose was also superior to the 0.15 mg/kg times three dose regimen with regard to total number of emetic episodes (medium-dose, P = .033) and failure rate (high-dose, 20% v 36%; P = .009; medium-dose, 9% v 22%; P = .011). Ondansetron was well tolerated. The most common adverse event was headache. An approximate 10-fold increase in the incidence of clinically significant transaminase elevations was observed in the high-dose versus medium-dose cisplatin strata (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], 6.5% v 0.7%; serum alanine aminotransferase [ALT], 5.0% v 0.3%).
Conclusion: A 32-mg single dose of ondansetron is more effective than a single 8-mg dose and is at least as effective as the standard regimen of 0.15 mg/kg times three doses in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis.
Similar articles
-
A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron alone and in combination with intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis.J Clin Oncol. 1994 Mar;12(3):596-600. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.3.596. J Clin Oncol. 1994. PMID: 8120559 Clinical Trial.
-
A single-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron, a selective serotonin antagonist, with intravenous metoclopramide in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy.J Clin Oncol. 1991 May;9(5):721-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.5.721. J Clin Oncol. 1991. PMID: 1826739 Clinical Trial.
-
Single-dose ondansetron for the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis: efficacy results.Semin Oncol. 1992 Dec;19(6 Suppl 15):14-9. Semin Oncol. 1992. PMID: 1485176 Clinical Trial.
-
Phase II trials of ondansetron with high-dose cisplatin.Semin Oncol. 1992 Aug;19(4 Suppl 10):23-7. Semin Oncol. 1992. PMID: 1387247 Review.
-
Phase I and other dose-ranging studies of ondansetron.Semin Oncol. 1992 Aug;19(4 Suppl 10):16-22. Semin Oncol. 1992. PMID: 1387246 Review.
Cited by
-
Granisetron vs ondansetron: is it a question of duration of 5-HT3 receptor blockade?Br J Cancer. 2002 May 20;86(10):1662-3; author reply 1664. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600313. Br J Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12085221 Free PMC article.
-
Ondansetron. An update of its therapeutic use in chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting.Drugs. 1993 Jun;45(6):931-952. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345060-00006. Drugs. 1993. PMID: 7691500 Review.
-
Effectiveness of a single-day three-drug regimen of dexamethasone, palonosetron, and aprepitant for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.Support Care Cancer. 2009 May;17(5):589-94. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0535-9. Epub 2008 Nov 27. Support Care Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19037667 Clinical Trial.
-
Ondansetron clinical pharmacokinetics.Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995 Aug;29(2):95-109. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199529020-00004. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995. PMID: 7586904 Review.
-
Stratified administration of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (setrons) for chemotherapy-induced emesis. Economic implications.Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Dec;18(6):533-56. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018060-00002. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000. PMID: 11227393 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical