Problems and timing in the removal of silicone oil

Abstract

The risk associated with silicone oil removal after complex vitreoretinal surgery is unclear. Therefore, a cohort of 87 consecutive cases of silicone oil removal were analyzed. Eyes with attached retina before silicone oil removal with a follow-up of at least 5 months were included into the study. Forty-eight eyes had severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy; 39 eyes had complex proliferative vitreoretinopathy or giant retinal tears after trauma. Additional clinical features included the presence of a secondary cataract or secondary glaucoma in some eyes. The rate of postoperative complications was different in the two groups: 75% of proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients remained attached; of proliferative vitreoretinopathy patients, only 48.5% remained stable. Whereas success was independent of the duration of intraocular silicone oil tamponade in proliferative diabetic retinopathy, removal of silicone oil was more successful in cases of proliferative vitreoretinopathy in which there was a longer period of silicone oil tamponade. Complications occurring usually were severe and led to a loss of visual acuity. The removal of silicone oil from eyes with secondary glaucoma resulted in an improvement in 68% of patients. The rate of vitreoretinal complications after silicone oil removal, even in cases with a clinically stable-appearing retina, is rather high. Silicone oil removal therefore has to be considered a procedure posing new and ill-defined risks, especially if the indications for the use of silicone oil as an internal tamponade are rather strict. Exact criteria for the timing and safe removal of silicone oil in these complex vitreoretinal disorders still need to be defined.