Chemosensitivity testing for gastrointestinal cancer: survival benefit potential and limitations
- PMID: 14551504
- DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200310000-00005
Chemosensitivity testing for gastrointestinal cancer: survival benefit potential and limitations
Abstract
Chemosensitivity testing is considered by some to be a useful method for predicting drug sensitivity of tumor tissues after surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Although survival benefit is not fully established, several chemosensitivity testing methods have been used clinically, both in the selection of adjuvant therapy and in the treatment of metastatic disease. Chemosensitivity testing is used not only for determination of drug resistance, but also for determination of drug sensitivity conferring a potential survival benefit. Previous retrospective correlation studies showed survival of patients treated with a 'tested' drug to be superior to that of patients treated with a standard drug, but the clinical benefit of chemosensitivity testing in comparison to surgical therapy alone or standard chemotherapy has not been documented in a randomized controlled trial. The clinical usefulness of individualized versus standard therapy needs to be determined. Here we discuss the potential survival benefit and current limitations of chemosensitivity testing in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.
Similar articles
-
Appraisal of the MTT-based assay as a useful tool for predicting drug chemosensitivity in leukemia.Leuk Lymphoma. 2003 Nov;44(11):1957-62. doi: 10.1080/1042819031000116607. Leuk Lymphoma. 2003. PMID: 14738150 Review.
-
[Cancer chemosensitivity test--from laboratory to clinic].Hum Cell. 1995 Dec;8(4):189-94. Hum Cell. 1995. PMID: 8721090 Review. Japanese.
-
[Chemosensitivity testing in ovarian cancer--prospects for the future].Ginekol Pol. 2014 Sep;85(9):695-8. Ginekol Pol. 2014. PMID: 25322542 Review. Polish.
-
Individualized adjuvant chemotherapy guided by chemosensitivity test sequential to extended surgery for advanced gastric cancer.Anticancer Res. 2005 Sep-Oct;25(5):3453-9. Anticancer Res. 2005. PMID: 16101163 Clinical Trial.
-
[Effects of chemotherapy on the basis of the results of MTT assay for patients with gastrointestinal cancer].Hum Cell. 1995 Dec;8(4):185-8. Hum Cell. 1995. PMID: 8721089 Japanese.
Cited by
-
[The correlation between the up-regulation of Hsp90 and drug resistance to cisplatin in lung cancer cell line].Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2011 Jun;14(6):472-7. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.06.02. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2011. PMID: 21645448 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Combination of histoculture drug response assay and qPCR as an effective method to screen biomarkers for personalized chemotherapy in esophageal cancer.Oncol Lett. 2017 Dec;14(6):6915-6922. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7069. Epub 2017 Sep 26. Oncol Lett. 2017. PMID: 29163710 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive value of in vitro adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay in advanced gastric cancer patients who received oral 5-Fluorouracil after curative resection.Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun;43(2):117-23. doi: 10.4143/crt.2011.43.2.117. Epub 2011 Jun 30. Cancer Res Treat. 2011. PMID: 21811428 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive value of MTT assay as an in vitro chemosensitivity testing for gastric cancer: one institution's experience.World J Gastroenterol. 2008 May 21;14(19):3064-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3064. World J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18494060 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources