The LifeSite Hemodialysis Access System in patients with limited access

Abstract

Objective: The LifeSite Hemodialysis Access System was recently introduced as a completely subcutaneous device with reported advantages of improved patient comfort and reduced catheter-related infection. The performance of the LifeSite catheter at a single, tertiary-care university medical center was reviewed.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent placement of the LifeSite catheter between February 2001 and March 2002. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the probability of patient survival, freedom from catheter-related infection, and freedom from device failure necessitating catheter removal.

Results: Thirty-six patients who had previously received dialysis for an average of 6.1 years underwent placement of 37 LifeSite catheters. Most patients (95%) were referred for LifeSite placement because they had exhausted all available arteriovenous fistula and graft sites. Mean follow-up was 6.8 months, with a patient survival rate of 81% at 8 months. Primary and secondary patency rates were 62% and 87% at 8 months, respectively. Two patients died from infectious device-related complications. Twelve of 17 patients (71%) with device-related infection did not manifest any signs or symptoms at the valve site. There were 2.4 catheter-related infections and 2.6 device failures requiring removal per 1000 patient-catheter days. Freedom from infection and device removal at 8 months was 46% and 49%, respectively.

Conclusions: The LifeSite demonstrated acceptable patency, infection, and device failure rates; however, in patients with limited access, unrecognized infection and death may occur. The LifeSite should not be used as a substitute for a more permanent form of hemodialysis access.