Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1863-77.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1408.

Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods

A J Haughton et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

The effects of the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) crops on the abundances of aerial and epigeal arthropods were assessed in 66 beet, 68 maize and 67 spring oilseed rape sites as part of the Farm Scale Evaluations of GMHT crops. Most higher taxa were insensitive to differences between GMHT and conventional weed management, but significant effects were found on the abundance of at least one group within each taxon studied. Numbers of butterflies in beet and spring oilseed rape and of Heteroptera and bees in beet were smaller under the relevant GMHT crop management, whereas the abundance of Collembola was consistently greater in all GMHT crops. Generally, these effects were specific to each crop type, reflected the phenology and ecology of the arthropod taxa, were indirect and related to herbicide management. These results apply generally to agriculture across Britain, and could be used in mathematical models to predict the possible long-term effects of the widespread adoption of GMHT technology. The results for bees and butterflies relate to foraging preferences and might or might not translate into effects on population densities, depending on whether adoption leads to forage reductions over large areas. These species, and the detritivore Collembola, may be useful indicator species for future studies of GMHT management.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1779-99 - PubMed
    1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1801-18 - PubMed
    1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1833-46 - PubMed
    1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1879-98 - PubMed
    1. J Environ Manage. 2003 Mar;67(3):207-18 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources