Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Oct 20;89(8):1433-8.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601311.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer using epirubicin/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (ECF) and alternative regimens before and after chemoradiation

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer using epirubicin/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (ECF) and alternative regimens before and after chemoradiation

T Leong et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Chemoradiation is now used more commonly for gastric cancer following publication of the US Intergroup trial results that demonstrate an advantage to adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy. However, there remain concerns regarding the toxicity of this treatment, the optimal chemotherapy regimen and the optimal method of radiotherapy delivery. In this prospective study, we evaluated the toxicity and feasibility of an alternative chemoradiation regimen to that used in the Intergroup trial. A total of 26 patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach were treated with 3D-conformal radiation therapy to a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The majority of patients received epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU (ECF) as the systemic component given before and after concurrent chemoradiation. The overall rates of observed grade 3 and 4 toxicities were 38 and 15%, respectively. GIT grade 3 toxicity was observed in 19% of patients, while haematologic grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed in 23%. Our results suggest that this adjuvant regimen can be delivered safely and with acceptable toxicity. This regimen forms the basis of several new studies being developed for postoperative adjuvant therapy of gastric cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram showing treatment delivered.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relapse-free survival among: (A) All postoperative patients; and (B) Postoperative patients treated with ECF vs those not treated with ECF. Five postoperative patients have relapsed and three have died. Relapse-free survival was defined as the interval between date of surgery and date of first relapse or death (if death preceded relapse).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beer M, Cocconi G, Ceci G, Varini M, Cavalli F (1983) A phase II study of cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19: 717–720 - PubMed
    1. Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, van_de_Velde CJ (1999) Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. Dutch Gastric Cancer Group. N Engl J Med 340: 908–914 - PubMed
    1. Cersosimo RJ, Hong WK (1986) Epirubicin: a review of the pharmacology, clinical activity, and adverse effects of an adriamycin analogue. J Clin Oncol 4: 425–439 - PubMed
    1. Chu JC, Solin LJ, Hwang CC, Kessler H, Hanks GE (1992) Three-dimensional dosimetric comparison of radiation therapy treatment planning of the pancreas. Med Dosim 17: 199–203 - PubMed
    1. Cuschieri A, Weeden S, Fielding J, Bancewicz J, Craven J, Joypaul V, Sydes M, Fayers P (1999) Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group. Br J Cancer 79: 1522–1530 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts