Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Oct 18;327(7420):906.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7420.906.

Effectiveness of out-of-home day care for disadvantaged families: randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effectiveness of out-of-home day care for disadvantaged families: randomised controlled trial

Tami Toroyan et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of providing daycare facilities for young children on the health and welfare of disadvantaged families.

Design: Randomised controlled trial. Eligible children from the application list to a daycare facility were randomly allocated to receive a daycare place or not.

Setting: Early Years daycare centre in Borough of Hackney, London.

Participants: 120 mothers and 143 eligible children (aged between 6 months and 3.5 years).

Intervention: A place at the centre, which provided high quality day care. Control families used other child care that they secured for themselves.

Main outcome measures: Maternal paid employment, household income, child health and development.

Results: At 18 months' follow up, 67% of intervention group mothers and 60% of control group mothers were in paid employment (adjusted risk ratio 1.23 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.52)), but were no more likely to have a weekly household income of above pound 200 (risk ratio 0.88 (0.70 to 1.09)). Intervention group children had more otitis media with effusion (risk ratio 1.74 (1.02 to 2.96)) and used more health services (1.58 (1.05 to 2.38)), but both estimates were imprecise.

Conclusion: The provision of child day care may have increased maternal employment, but it did not seem to increase household income. The results suggest that providing day care may be insufficient as a strategy to reduce poverty. The study shows how random allocation can be used to ration and evaluate interventions where demand exceeds supply.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of participants through study

References

    1. Oppenheim C, Harker L. Poverty—the facts. 3rd ed. London: Child Poverty Action Group, 1996.
    1. Treasury. The modernisation of Britain's tax and benefit system (Number 4). Tackling poverty and extending opportunity. London: Treasury, 1999.
    1. Treasury. Spending review 2002. Opportunity and security for all: investing in an enterprising, fairer Britain. London: Stationery Office, 2002.
    1. Acheson D. Independent inquiry into inequalities in health. London: Stationery Office, 1998.
    1. Roberts I, Power C. Does the decline in child injury death rates vary by social class? BMJ 1996;313: 784-6. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources