Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000;14(3):138-42.
doi: 10.1007/s005400070021.

Changes in left ventricular end-diastolic area, end-systolic wall stress, and fractional area change during anesthetic induction with propofol or thiamylal

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Changes in left ventricular end-diastolic area, end-systolic wall stress, and fractional area change during anesthetic induction with propofol or thiamylal

K Yamaura et al. J Anesth. 2000.

Abstract

Purpose: To elucidate the mechanisms of the more profound hypotensive effects of propofol relative to thiamylal, we monitored changes in left ventricular (LV) preload, afterload, and contractility during the course of anesthetic induction with propofol and thiamylal.

Methods: Thirty-two patients (ASA I) were randomly assigned into two groups and injected with propofol (2 mg.kg(-1)) or thiamylal (4 mg.kg(-1)) as anesthetic induction agents. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was used to assess LV performance before and during induction by the two anesthetics. The LV end-diastolic area (EDA) and LV end-systolic wall stress (ESWS) were used as indices of LV preload and LV afterload, respectively, while LV contractility was assessed by the fractional area change (FAC).

Results: Both propofol and thiamylal significantly reduced EDA and ESWS without significant change in FAC. Propofol-induced reductions in EDA and ESWS were significantly greater than those of thiamylal.

Conclusion: The more profound hypotension observed during induction of anesthesia with propofol is due to the greater decrease in preload and afterload than with thiamylal, but not to a decrease in LV contractility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources