Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Oct;143(4):484-7.
doi: 10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00443-8.

Early feeding after necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants

Affiliations

Early feeding after necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants

Bettina Bohnhorst et al. J Pediatr. 2003 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To report our experience with an early initiation of enteral feedings after necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

Study design: Over a 4-year period, all inborn infants with NEC Bell stage II or greater received enteral feedings, increased by 20 mL/kg/d, once no portal vein gas had been detected on ultrasound for 3 consecutive days (group 1). Infants were compared with a historic comparison group (group 2).

Results: Necrotizing enterocolitis rates were 5% (26/523) in the early feeding group and 4% (18/436) in the comparison group. One early feeding infant and two comparison group infants died of NEC, whereas two and one, respectively, had recurrent NEC. Enteral feedings were restarted at a median of 4 days (range, 3-14) versus 10 days (range, 8-22) after onset of NEC. Early feeding was associated with shorter time to reach full enteral feedings (10 days [range, 7-31] vs 19 days [range, 9-76], P<.001), a reduced duration of central venous access (13.5 days [range, 8-24] vs 26.0 days [range, 8-39], P<.01), less catheter-related septicemia (18% vs 29%, P<.01), and a shorter duration of hospital stay (63 days [range, 28-133] vs 69 days [range, 36-150], P<.05).

Conclusion: Early enteral feeding after NEC was associated with significant benefits and no apparent adverse effects. This study was underpowered, however, to exclude a higher NEC recurrence risk potentially associated with this change in practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources