The effects of clean indoor air laws: what do we know and what do we need to know?
- PMID: 14572019
- DOI: 10.1093/her/cyf045
The effects of clean indoor air laws: what do we know and what do we need to know?
Abstract
Our objective was to review the research on the effects of public clean air laws on smoking rates, compare these effects to those found in studies on the impact of private worksite restrictions and derive estimates of the potential reductions in smoking rates that might be expected from the implementation of the two types of policies. Data sources were computerized databases, references identified from pertinent peer-reviewed journal articles and books, and suggestions by experts on tobacco control policy. Comprehensive public clean air laws have the potential to reduce prevalence and consumption rates of the entire population (including non-working and non-indoor working smokers) by about 10%. Studies on private worksite regulations also suggest that strong worksite restrictions have the potential to reduce the prevalence rate of the entire population by about 6% over the long-term and the quantity smoked by continuing smokers by 28%, depending on the length of time after the ban. Further research is needed on the effects of the different types of public clean air policies on the entire smoking population and on different sociodemographic groups, how the effects of public clean indoor air laws depend on private restrictions already in place, and how the effect of private restrictions depend on whether or not they are supported by public clean air laws.
Similar articles
-
Effect of clean indoor air laws on smokers: the clean air module of the SimSmoke computer simulation model.Tob Control. 2001 Dec;10(4):345-51. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.4.345. Tob Control. 2001. PMID: 11740026 Free PMC article.
-
A framework for evaluating and improving clean indoor air laws.J Public Health Manag Pract. 2001 Sep;7(5):87-96. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200107050-00012. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2001. PMID: 11680035
-
Effects of venue-specific state clean indoor air laws on smoking-related outcomes.Health Econ. 2010 Dec;19(12):1425-40. doi: 10.1002/hec.1559. Health Econ. 2010. PMID: 19998352
-
The economic impact of clean indoor air laws.CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Nov-Dec;57(6):367-78. doi: 10.3322/CA.57.6.367. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007. PMID: 17989131 Review.
-
The diffusion and impact of clean indoor air laws.Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:171-85. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090920. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008. PMID: 18348710 Review.
Cited by
-
Substance abuse treatment counselors and tobacco use: a comparison of comprehensive and indoor-only workplace smoking bans.Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Nov;12(11):1151-5. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq145. Epub 2010 Sep 2. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010. PMID: 20813761 Free PMC article.
-
Croatian smoke-free law and smoking habits among employees of health care facilities in Koprivnica-Križevci County.Croat Med J. 2013 Aug;54(4):407-10. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.407. Croat Med J. 2013. PMID: 23986285 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Quit attempts and quit rates among menthol and nonmenthol smokers in the United States.Am J Public Health. 2011 Jul;101(7):1241-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300178. Epub 2011 May 12. Am J Public Health. 2011. PMID: 21566032 Free PMC article.
-
Tobacco policies and on-premise smoking in bars and clubs that cater to young African Americans following the Maryland Clean Indoor Air Act of 2007.J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2017 Jul-Sep;16(3):328-343. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2016.1196631. Epub 2016 Jul 12. J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2017. PMID: 27403708 Free PMC article.
-
The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence in California: results from the California tobacco policy simulation model.Health Policy. 2007 Jul;82(2):167-85. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.09.008. Epub 2006 Oct 19. Health Policy. 2007. PMID: 17055104 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical