Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Oct;79(5):375-81.
doi: 10.1136/sti.79.5.375.

Is antenatal syphilis screening still cost effective in sub-Saharan Africa

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Is antenatal syphilis screening still cost effective in sub-Saharan Africa

F Terris-Prestholt et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the cost effectiveness of on-site antenatal syphilis screening and treatment in Mwanza, Tanzania. To compare this intervention with other antenatal and child health interventions, specifically the prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT).

Methods: The economic costs of adding the intervention to routine antenatal care were assessed. Cost effectiveness (CE) ratios of the intervention were obtained for low birth weight (LBW) live births and stillbirths averted and cost per DALY saved. Cost per DALY saved was also estimated for previous CE studies of syphilis screening. The CE of the intervention at different syphilis prevalence rates was modelled.

Results: The economic cost of the intervention is $1.44 per woman screened, $20 per woman treated, and $187 per adverse birth outcome averted. The cost per DALY saved is $110 with LBW as the only adverse outcome. When including stillbirth, this estimate improves 10-fold to $10.56 per DALY saved. The cost per DALY saved from all syphilis screening studies ranged from $3.97 to $18.73.

Conclusions: Syphilis screening is shown to be at least as cost effective as PMTCT and more cost effective than many widely implemented interventions. There is urgent need for scaling up syphilis screening and treatment in high prevalence areas. The CE of screening interventions is highly dependent on disease prevalence. In combination, PMTCT and syphilis screening and treatment interventions may achieve economies of scope and thus improved efficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Health Policy Plan. 2000 Mar;15(1):34-42 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1999 Sep 4;354(9181):803-9 - PubMed
    1. Health Policy Plan. 2001 Mar;16(1):29-34 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 2001 May;91(5):705-7 - PubMed
    1. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(7):608-14 - PubMed

Publication types