Prediction of the outcome of genetic testing in HNPCC kindreds using the revised Amsterdam criteria and immunohistochemistry
- PMID: 14574174
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1021151227983
Prediction of the outcome of genetic testing in HNPCC kindreds using the revised Amsterdam criteria and immunohistochemistry
Abstract
Background and aims: Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) may be caused by mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6. Family history (Amsterdam criteria) has traditionally been used to select patients for mutation testing. It has been demonstrated that germline mutations in the MMR genes are associated with lack of the corresponding gene product as assessed with immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tumour specimens. The aim of the study was to assess the value of the Amsterdam criteria II and IHC in predicting germline mutations.
Methods: Fifty-six families that were previously tested for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutations were selected for this study. All pedigrees were extended and verified and the families were scored according to the original (I) and the revised Amsterdam criteria (II). The probabilities for MLH1 and MSH2 mutations were calculated by logistic regression. In addition, all available tumour material from indexed family members was examined by IHC for the presence of the three gene products.
Results: Three out of seven (39%) families where the mutation could be identified complied with the Amsterdam criteria I, while all seven (100%) met the Amsterdam criteria II. All families carrying a MLH1 or MSH2 mutation had > 15% calculated probability of finding a mutation. Tumours from all seven mutation carriers lacked the immunohistochemical expression of the corresponding MMR gene.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the Amsterdam criteria II in combination with immunohistochemistry of the mismatch repair proteins in tumours may be a cost-effective approach to select families for mutation analysis.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of revised Bethesda guidelines, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry for the identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.JAMA. 2005 Apr 27;293(16):1986-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.16.1986. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15855432
-
Value of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair proteins in predicting germline mutation in hereditary colorectal neoplasms.Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Jan;29(1):96-104. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000146009.85309.3b. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005. PMID: 15613860
-
Toward new strategies to select young endometrial cancer patients for mismatch repair gene mutation analysis.J Clin Oncol. 2003 Dec 1;21(23):4364-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.094. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 14645426
-
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: diagnostic strategies and their implications.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 May;(150):1-180. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007. PMID: 17764220 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The utility of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair gene proteins.Virchows Arch. 2004 Nov;445(5):431-41. doi: 10.1007/s00428-004-1090-5. Epub 2004 Sep 29. Virchows Arch. 2004. PMID: 15455227 Review.
Cited by
-
Identification of mismatch repair gene mutations in young patients with colorectal cancer and in patients with multiple tumours associated with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.Gut. 2006 Dec;55(12):1781-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.090159. Epub 2006 Apr 24. Gut. 2006. PMID: 16636019 Free PMC article.
-
High risk of endometrial cancer in colorectal cancer kindred is pathognomonic for MMR-mutation carriers.Fam Cancer. 2009;8(2):145-51. doi: 10.1007/s10689-008-9219-3. Epub 2008 Oct 8. Fam Cancer. 2009. PMID: 18841495
-
MUTYH Mutations Do Not Cause HNPCC or Late Onset Familial Colorectal Cancer.Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2006 May 15;4(2):90-3. doi: 10.1186/1897-4287-4-2-90. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2006. PMID: 20223013 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous