Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Sep;19(3):137-41.

Effects of pupil diameter on light detection and temporal modulation

Affiliations
  • PMID: 14574966

Effects of pupil diameter on light detection and temporal modulation

Rachel S Li et al. Yan Ke Xue Bao. 2003 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the effects of pupil variation on light detection and temporal modulation across the central visual field.

Methods: Light detection sensitivity (LDS) and low flickering frequency (6 Hz) temporal modulation sensitivity (TMS) of 20 young subjects were measured from the central visual field of the right eyes using an autumated perimeter (Medmont M600). The measurements were taken under 3 artificial pupils, i.e. 3 mm, 4.3 mm and 6 mm diameters. The sensitivities were grouped and averaged for different retinal eccentricities (3 degrees, 6 degrees, 10 degrees, and 15 degrees).

Results: TMS and LDS were reduced with increasing retinal eccentricities (P < 0.001) and decreasing pupil diameters (P < 0.001). TMS collected from all pupil diameters were significantly different from each other (P < 0.001). Similarly, LDS under 3 mm pupil was statistically different from those of 4.3 mm and 6 mm (P < 0.003). Comparison of the hills of vision showed that pupil variation resulted in significantly different slopes (P = 0.001). The slopes were also found to be significantly different between TMS and LDS (P = 0.012).

Conclusions: The data showed that dilated pupil resulted in significantly higher sensitivities than those of smaller pupil for both visual functions. The difference in the slopes of hills of vision also suggested that the variation in retinal illumination affected the visual responses differently at various retinal eccentricities for TMS and LDS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles