How do tissues respond and adapt to stresses around a prosthesis? A primer on finite element stress analysis for orthopaedic surgeons
- PMID: 14575244
- PMCID: PMC1888390
How do tissues respond and adapt to stresses around a prosthesis? A primer on finite element stress analysis for orthopaedic surgeons
Abstract
Joint implant design clearly affects long-term outcome. While many implant designs have been empirically-based, finite element analysis has the potential to identify beneficial and deleterious features prior to clinical trials. Finite element analysis is a powerful analytic tool allowing computation of the stress and strain distribution throughout an implant construct. Whether it is useful depends upon many assumptions and details of the model. Since ultimate failure is related to biological factors in addition to mechanical, and since the mechanical causes of failure are related to load history, rather than a few loading conditions, chief among them is whether the stresses or strains under limited loading conditions relate to outcome. Newer approaches can minimize this and the many other model limitations. If the surgeon is to critically and properly interpret the results in scientific articles and sales literature, he or she must have a fundamental understanding of finite element analysis. We outline here the major capabilities of finite element analysis, as well as the assumptions and limitations.
Similar articles
-
Finite element analysis of a TMJ implant.J Dent Res. 2010 Mar;89(3):241-5. doi: 10.1177/0022034509357716. Epub 2009 Dec 30. J Dent Res. 2010. PMID: 20042741
-
Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 1;34(15):1554-60. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa643b. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID: 19564765
-
The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004 Mar;19(3):292-302. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.12.002. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004. PMID: 15003345
-
Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):585-98. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115251. J Prosthet Dent. 2001. PMID: 11404759 Review.
-
Biomechanics of oral implants: a review of the literature.Technol Health Care. 1997 Oct;5(4):253-73. Technol Health Care. 1997. PMID: 9429268 Review.
Cited by
-
50 years ago in CORR: Biomechanics of hip prostheses. Duncan C. McKeever, MD CORR 1961;19:187-199.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):626-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2195-1. Epub 2011 Nov 19. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 22101406 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Adams DJ, Spirt AA, Brown TD, Fritton SP, Rubin CT, Brand RA. Testing the daily stress stimulus theory of bone adaptation with natural and experimentally controlled strain histories. J Biomech. 1997;30:671–678. - PubMed
-
- Biewener AA. Bone strength in small mammals and bipedal birds: do safety factors change with body size? J Exp Biol. 1982;98:289–301. - PubMed
-
- Brand RA. Autonomous informational stability in connective tissues. Med Hypotheses. 1992;37:107–114. - PubMed
-
- Brand RA, Pedersen DR, Davy DT, Kotzar GM, Heiple KG, Goldberg VM. Comparison of hip force calculations and measurements in the same patient. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:45–51. - PubMed
-
- Brand RA, Stanford CM. How connective tissues temporally process mechanical stimuli. Med Hypotheses. 1994;42:99–104. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources