Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Dec;17(12):1961-4.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9256-1. Epub 2003 Oct 28.

Preincisional local infiltration of levobupivacaine vs ropivacaine for pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Preincisional local infiltration of levobupivacaine vs ropivacaine for pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

P Papagiannopoulou et al. Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain is less intense after laparoscopic surgery than after open surgery. However, patients may gain additional benefit from a preincisional local infiltration of anesthetic. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of two local anesthetics, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine, for tissue infiltration as a means of improving postoperative pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods: Using a randomized, double-blind study design, 57 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to receive local infiltration with 0.9% saline solution (Placebo group, n = 18), ropivacaine 1% (Rop group, n = 20), or levobupivacaine 0.5% (Lev group, n = 19). The local anesthetic was administered, prior to trocar placement, using the same technique and delivering the same volume (20 ml) for all three groups. The anesthetic technique was standardized for all groups. Postoperative pain was rated at 2 h, 4 h, and 24 h postoperatively by visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Cumulative analgesic consumption and adverse effects were also recorded. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a post hoc test.

Results: The Lev and Rop groups did not differ significantly in their VAS scores at 2 h postoperatively, but the Lev group experienced significantly ( p < 0.001) less pain than the Placebo and Rop groups at 4 h and 24 h postoperatively. The Rop group registered significantly lower VAS scores ( p < 0.001) than the Placebo group at 4 h postoperatively. Additionally, the consumption of analgesics was significantly lower in the Lev group than in the Rop ( p < 0.01) and Placebo ( p < 0.001) groups, and patients in the Rop group consumed significantly less analgesics ( p < 0.001) than the to patients in the Placebo group.

Conclusion: Local tissue infiltration with levobupivacaine is more effective than ropivacaine in reducing the postoperative pain associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anesth Analg. 1990 Jan;70(1):16-21 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Surg. 1997 May;163(5):371-8 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 1993 Nov-Dec;7(6):482-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1997 Jul;84(7):958-61 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 2000 Aug;91(2):403-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources