Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Nov;238(5):680-5.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000094302.51616.2a.

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it beneficial for patients of heavier weight?

Hirokazu Noshiro  1 , Shuji Shimizu, Eishi Nagai, Kenoki Ohuchida, Masao Tanaka
Affiliations

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it beneficial for patients of heavier weight?

Hirokazu Noshiro et al. Ann Surg. 2003 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: In this retrospective review, we evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of LADG for patients of heavier weight with early gastric cancer.

Summary background data: LADG has been used to treat early gastric cancer. We and others have reported less operative blood loss, less pain, early recovery of bowel activity, early restart of oral intake, and a shorter hospital stay with LADG compared with a conventional open method. There is, however, little information on the advantages of LADG for obese patients with early gastric cancer.

Methods: Between January 1996 and March 2002, 76 patients with preoperatively diagnosed early gastric carcinoma underwent LADG in our department. We classified these patients into 2 groups on the basis of body mass index (BMI). Nineteen patients had a high-BMI (>/= 24.2 kg/m2), and 57 patients had a normal-BMI (<24.2 kg/m2). We collected data by retrospectively reviewing the medical charts.

Results: Extension of the minilaparotomic incision or conversion to laparotomy was needed in 6 (32%) of the 19 patients in the high-BMI group, whereas only 3 (5%) of 57 patients in the normal-BMI group required either. In the high-BMI group, Roux-en-Y anastomosis rather than Billroth I anastomosis was adopted more often than in the normal-BMI group, due to the difficulty of the reconstruction (58% versus 4%, P = 0.001). Significantly longer operative time (370 +/- 61 minutes versus 317 +/- 58 minutes, P = 0.015) and prolonged recovery of bowel activity (3.5 +/- 1.0 days versus 2.6 +/- 1.0 days, P = 0.007) were observed in the patients in the high-BMI group.

Conclusions: In the current study, LADG in patients of heavier weight was accompanied by more technical difficulties, and the disadvantages of longer operative time and delayed recovery of bowel activity was observed in patients of heavier weight. Heavier weight appears to be an ominous factor in the successful completion of LADG and should be considered in the decision to use LADG. There are still benefits of a decreased incidence of serious wound and hernia complications in successful cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Lymph node dissection around the celiac axis. Arrow shows the stump of the left gastric artery.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Akahoshi K, Chijiiwa K, Sasaki I, et al. Pre-operative TN staging of gastric cancer using a 15 Mhz ultrasound miniprobe. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:703–707. - PubMed
    1. Fukutomi H, Sakita T. Analysis of early gastric cancer cases collected from major hospitals and institutes in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1984;14:169–179. - PubMed
    1. Iriyama K, Asakawa T, Koike H, et al. Is extensive lymphadenectomy necessary for surgical treatment of intramucosal carcinoma of the stomach? Arch Surg. 1989;124:309–311. - PubMed
    1. Kitaoka H, Yoshikawa K, Hirota T, et al. Surgical treatment of early gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1984;14:283–293. - PubMed
    1. Korenaga D, Haraguchi M, Tsujitani S, et al. Clinicopathological features of mucosal carcinoma of the stomach with lymph node metastasis in eleven patients. Br J Surg. 1986;73:431–433. - PubMed