Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus in sheep: comparative pullout study of dental implants
- PMID: 14579957
Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus in sheep: comparative pullout study of dental implants
Abstract
Purpose: In this experimental study, dental implants placed after maxillary sinus grafting with either porous hydroxyapatite (HA) (Interpore 200) or autogenous bone were examined for their mechanical stress tolerance.
Materials and methods: A total of 54 titanium plasma flame-sprayed cylindric implants were placed in the lateral sinus wall bilaterally of 27 mountain sheep. The bony sinuses were opened through an extraoral approach. Eighteen sinuses were grafted with porous HA, and another 18 were grafted with cancellous bone from the iliac crest. Eighteen non-grafted sinuses were used as controls. In the same operation, 2 cylindric implants were placed in each of the sinuses. One implant of each sinus was tested for mechanical strength of the bone-implant interface at 12, 16, and 26 weeks using pullout force.
Results: The mean pullout force was 259.3 N in the control group, 356.7 N in the autogenous bone group, and 376 N in the HA group. Pooled data for the grafted sites showed the pullout force to be significantly higher than in the empty control sites (P = .02). The pullout force increased significantly with ongoing healing time (P = .02), but there was considerable variation within the groups. While the force remained more or less constant throughout the follow-up time in the controls (248 N at week 12 to 276 N at week 26), it increased dramatically in the group augmented with autogenous bone (223.8 N at week 12 to 523.16 N at week 26). The pullout force was initially highest in the HA group (302.3 N at week 12) and increased to 423.5 N at 26 weeks, but it did not reach the levels recorded in the autografted group.
Discussion and conclusion: Mechanical tests of bone-to-implant contact in a sheep model showed that HA for 1-stage sinus floor elevation significantly increased the pullout force versus ungrafted sinuses, although it was less than that found with autogenous bone after 26 weeks.
Similar articles
-
Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 May-Jun;17(3):337-46. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002. PMID: 12074448
-
Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):704-11. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009. PMID: 19885412
-
A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Sep-Oct;17(5):635-43. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002. PMID: 12381063
-
A literature review on biomaterials in sinus augmentation procedures.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Sep;9(3):166-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00050.x. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007. PMID: 17716261 Review.
-
Effect of HA coating on the long-term survival of dental implant: a review of the literature.J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1996;6(2):119-33. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1996. PMID: 10163509 Review.
Cited by
-
Retrospective analysis of 10,000 implants from insertion up to 20 years-analysis of implantations using augmentative procedures.Int J Implant Dent. 2016 Dec;2(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40729-016-0061-3. Epub 2016 Dec 3. Int J Implant Dent. 2016. PMID: 27915417 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of One-Drill Protocol to Sequential Drilling In Vitro and In Vivo.Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jan 9;12(1):51. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12010051. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39851324 Free PMC article.