Amount and direction of temporomandibular joint growth changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation
- PMID: 14580015
- DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0493:AADOTJ>2.0.CO;2
Amount and direction of temporomandibular joint growth changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation
Abstract
The amount and direction of condylar growth, glenoid fossa displacement, and "effective" temporomandibular joint (TMJ) changes (a summation of condylar growth, glenoid fossa displacement, and condylar position changes within the fossa) were analyzed in 35 Class II, Division 1 malocclusions (23 boys and 12 girls) treated with the Herbst appliance. Lateral head films in habitual occlusion and with the mouth wide open from before (T1) and after 7.5 months of Herbst treatment (T2) as well as 7.5 months (T3) and three years (T4) after treatment were evaluated. As a control group, a sample of 12 untreated male Class II Division I malocclusions was used during a 7.5-month time period corresponding to the treatment period (T2-T1) of the Herbst cases. The results revealed that during the treatment period (T2-T1) condylar growth was directed posteriorly about twice the amount as in the control subjects, and the fossa was displaced in an anterior inferior direction. The effective TMJ changes showed a pattern similar to condylar growth but were more pronounced. During the first posttreatment period (T3-T2), all TMJ changes reverted. The glenoid fossa was displaced backward; the amount of condylar growth and effective TMJ changes was reduced, and the changes were more superiorly directed. During the second posttreatment period (T4-T3), all TMJ changes were considered physiological.
Conclusion: During Herbst treatment, the amount and direction of TMJ changes (condylar growth, fossa displacement, and effective TMJ changes) were only temporarily affected favorably by Herbst treatment.
Comment in
-
Re: Amount and direction of temporomandibular joint growth changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(5):493-501.Angle Orthod. 2005 May;75(3):496; author reply 496. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[497:RRFDPA]2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 2005. PMID: 15898395 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Aug;126(2):153-61; quiz 254-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.07.015. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004. PMID: 15316469
-
Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study.Eur J Orthod. 1998 Aug;20(4):375-88. doi: 10.1093/ejo/20.4.375. Eur J Orthod. 1998. PMID: 9753819
-
Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: Activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study.Eur J Orthod. 2002 Dec;24(6):627-37. doi: 10.1093/ejo/24.6.627. Eur J Orthod. 2002. PMID: 12512780
-
Improved clinical use of Twin-block and Herbst as a result of radiating viscoelastic tissue forces on the condyle and fossa in treatment and long-term retention: growth relativity.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Mar;117(3):247-66. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70231-9. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000. PMID: 10715086 Review.
-
Effect of Herbst treatment on temporomandibular joint morphology: a systematic literature review.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Apr;123(4):388-94. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.89. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003. PMID: 12695765
Cited by
-
Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients with different vertical facial patterns treated with the Herbst appliance.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Aug;154(2):238-248.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.037. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018. PMID: 30075926 Free PMC article.
-
[Functional clear aligner treatment of class Ⅱ malocclusion in teenagers].Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 1;37(3):236-241. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2019.03.002. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31218854 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0045-x. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Prog Orthod. 2014. PMID: 25138988 Free PMC article.
-
Oral Implications of Herbst Device Modification: A Case Report.Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;12(5):531. doi: 10.3390/children12050531. Children (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40426710 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Dec;144(6):818-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.014. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013. PMID: 24286905 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials